North Carolina State University will develop a psychometrically reliable and valid standard scale for measurement of students' stereotypes about science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professions and professionals in relation to attitudes about the participation of women and people of color in STEM fields.

The project goals are to (1) to provide researchers with a standard survey scale (STEM Scale) that captures undergraduate students' contemporary images of science/engineering and scientists/engineers in the context of attitudes about gender and ethnic/racial diversity, (2) to provide researchers with standard survey scales and subscales that are specific to fields/disciplines, if/where significant field differences exist, and (3) to advance a common and empirically informed national discussion about students' preconceptions and attitudes about STEM professions and professionals.

Intellectual Merit. Though there are existing scales that measure images of scientists, or attitudes about women, or ethnic/racial identity, none of these have been developed to address the intersections of gender and ethnicity/race with images and attitudes about STEM fields

Project activities are defined in pace and scope in a progression from local and exploratory tests, to a national validation study, then to public dissemination. In the first year, the team will collect 100+ items generated in local STEM focus groups and gleaned from existing scales, then pilot, tested and revise in large section local STEM courses to identify items that significantly contribute to key constructs. In the second year, the team will consolidate remaining items and distribute a refined survey instrument through a national network of cooperating faculty. The projected sample size is 10,000 student responses. Though a combination of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, analyses of a national data set (collected via online distribution and response) will identify a core STEM Scale and discipline-specific sub-scales, if and where disciplinary distinctions exist. In the third year, project activities are directed at disseminating information about the STEM scale and its psychometric properties, providing a "field test" of the scale in a discipline-specific setting, and fostering incorporation of the scale into research about factors influencing persistence, performance, and career commitment.

Broader Impacts. Because attitudes related to gender and ethnicity/race (about self or others) have been associated with a wide range of inequalities in educational and career outcomes, the STEM Scale has applications as a basic tool in many areas of social research. The study will promote theory and research about the role of stereotypes in academic performance and persistence, and in career development and commitment, exploring the contribution of STEM course content to stereotype maintenance or disruption, and evaluating change over time in cultural images of STEM professions and professionals.

Project Report

"Measurement Matters" was designed to provide educators and researchers with a much needed standardized and statistically valid and reliable tool that captures prevailing contemporary stereotypes about scientists. The results are based on survey responses from over 2,700 students at U.S. universities. The project produced a series of survey items that together create a scale called the Stereotypes of Scientists (SOS) scale. It can be used to assess students’ preconceptions about scientists. The SOS scale is a survey tool that helps researchers document how positively or negatively students view scientists, with attention to the skills and abilities that students attribute to scientists. In this study, the researchers found that students describe scientists positively, as having both professional and interpersonal competencies. As a survey research tool, the scale has applications in theory and research about how stereotypes function to promote or discourage persistence and performance in STEM, how (or if) they can be diluted or dismantled through direct and sustained challenge, and how career choices and commitment unfold against the backdrop that stereotypes provide. The SOS scale can also be used to explore whether or not there are differences in preconceptions about scientists by age, education, class, country, or other background variables.

Agency
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Institute
Division of Human Resource Development (HRD)
Application #
0522860
Program Officer
Jolene K. Jesse
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2005-07-01
Budget End
2010-12-31
Support Year
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$517,762
Indirect Cost
Name
North Carolina State University Raleigh
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Raleigh
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27695