The project will investigate a central question for democratic government: how citizens learn and form opinions about political choices. The convergence of low-information models of rationality and recent work in cognitive neuroscience indicates that the relationship between emotion and cognition is central to political information processing. Judgmental heuristics are often used by individuals to reason about choices when, as is usually the case, they possess incomplete information and limited ability to consider it. Emotions function as timesaving cues, or short cuts, in the cognitive process of integrating old and new information. Because emotions often operate pre-consciously, research into their role demands experimental conditions under which the investigator has greater control of the informational environment than can typically be achieved in survey-based research. In this work, experimental research will test the relative importance of these factors in political choice. The experiment will assess whether emotional and cognitive reactions are distinct and salient factors in the process of attitude formation. The experiment will also test previous survey-based evidence that anxiety can affect political learning by inhibiting prior attitudes and focusing attention on new information.

Agency
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Institute
Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
Type
Standard Grant (Standard)
Application #
9632565
Program Officer
Marianne C. Stewart
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
1996-08-15
Budget End
1998-07-31
Support Year
Fiscal Year
1996
Total Cost
$8,000
Indirect Cost
Name
Harvard University
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138