Most difficult decisions require tradeoffs among competing objectives that cannot be maximized simultaneously. This research investigates how changes in perceived task goals lead to changes in the relative weighting of decisions. This research will test the recently proposed task-goal hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, tasks whose goal is to differentiate among alternatives lead to greater weighing of the most important objectives than tasks whose goal is to equate alternatives. The proposed research has important implications both for theories of decision making and for methods of measuring preferences in decision analysis, marketing and public policy.

Agency
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Institute
Division of Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
Type
Standard Grant (Standard)
Application #
9709615
Program Officer
Hal R. Arkes
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
1997-08-01
Budget End
2000-05-31
Support Year
Fiscal Year
1997
Total Cost
$91,334
Indirect Cost
Name
Duke University
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Durham
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27705