BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) has emerged as one of the key treatments for BRAFV600E mutation which accounts for 60% of cutaneous melanomas. While the response rate is high and responses can be rapid, relapse is inevitable and often occurs within 6 months. The addition of MEK inhibitor (MEKi) could increase the duration of response from 6 to 9 months and increase one year survival to 40%. However, relapse invariably occurs and there is no effective salvage treatment available. Another approach is the use of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA 4 antibody) and anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD1) antibody (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) showed an increase in duration of response (99 weeks) and increased overall survival (63% one year survival rate). However, the time to response is often long for these agents, and when rapid disease progression occurs, especially after BRAF failure, patients may not be able to complete the planned treatment course, as has been reported for ipilimumab. Currently, there is a paucity of published data on the antitumor activity of anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 after BRAFi failure or BRAFi and MEKi failure patients. In this application, we plan to target to treat this group of patients which has rapid progressive disease and extremely poor prognosis. Our preliminary data showed that these resistant cells are very sensitive to arginine deprivation and pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) which degrades arginine to citrulline produced >80% decrease in these resistant tumors in vivo. We plan to investigate the underlying mechanism(s) and translate this into clinical trial. Our previou work and others have shown that certain melanomas do not express argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS), a key enzyme in the urea cycle, to synthesize arginine. These tumors depend on exogenous arginine to survive. ADI-PEG20 inhibits tumor growth with minimal toxicity since normal cells can take up citrulline to make arginine. However, we have found that autophagy does occur which can blunt the antitumor effect and re-expression of ASS can develop. These two mechanisms can account for drug resistance seen with this treatment. Importantly, we have found that cMyc is a positive regulator for re- expression of ASS. Interestingly, we have found that both BRAF resistant (BR) and dual resistant [resistant to both BRAFi and MEKi (BMR)] cells cannot readily undergo autophagy due to decrease in AMPK1-? and Atg5. This makes these resistant cells exquisitely sensitive to ADI-PEG20 treatment. In addition, both BR and BMR cells are unable to re-express ASS gene due to decrease in cMyc, and hence they cannot evade the apoptotic effect by ADI-PEG20 treatment. We plan to investigate how cMyc, AMPK1-?, and Atg5 are down regulated. Importantly, we plan to investigate the clinical relevance of our laboratory findings by examining tumor samples obtained from BR and BRM patients for AMPK1-?, Atg5 and ASS expression and for ADI-PEG20 sensitivity using tumor explant and primary culture as outlined in aim 2. Clinically, BR and BMR patients usually progress very rapidly and ADI-PEG20 alone may not be sufficient to control the tumor.
In aim 3, we plan to investigate which combination with ADI-PEG20 yields the best antitumor efficacy. Based on our preliminary data, we plan to combine ADI-PEG20 with MEKi in BR tumors and ADI-PEG20 with Hsp-90 inhibitors in BMR tumors. Our ultimate goal is to apply this combination to treat this group of extremely poor prognosis patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a major component for the treatment of melanoma, and the effect of ADI- PEG20 on PD-1 and PD-L1 expression has not been explored. Our preliminary data showed that ADI-PEG20 can upregulate PD-L1 in BR and BMR cells, which may potentiate the antitumor effect of anti-PD-1 and anti- PD-L1 antibody. We plan to examine tumor explants, BR, and BMR cells for PD-1/PD-L1 expression before and after ADI-PEG20 treatment. Furthermore, we will also examine PD-1 expression from lymphocytes in these patients before and after treatment with ADI-PEG20. Thus, future combinatorial treatment using both agents can be rationally formulated to treat ASS (-) melanoma patients.

Public Health Relevance

Melanomas may have BRAF mutation which makes them sensitive to BRAF and MEK inhibitor drugs, but the duration of response is usually short (<1year) and the disease rapidly progresses. We have found that these BRAF inhibitor resistant (BR) tumors are exquisitely sensitive to arginine depletion using ADI-PEG20. A clinical trial was previously carried out by us using ADI-PEG20. Encouraging antitumor responses with minimal toxicity were seen in patients whose melanomas lack argininesuccinate synthetase (ASS-) which is needed in the body to make arginine. Not all patients responded to ADI-PEG20 therapy due to the ASS re-expression. Here we showed that BR cells cannot re-express ASS and are unable to cannibalize their organelles (autophagy) to survive and so are hypersensitive to ADI-PEG20. In this study, we plan to investigate the mechanisms involved in order to better design clinical trials since arginine deprivation with ADI-PEG20 alone or in combination with other agents appears to be an attractive treatment for BRAF inhibitor resistant tumor.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Veterans Affairs (VA)
Type
Non-HHS Research Projects (I01)
Project #
1I01BX003328-01
Application #
9032562
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ONCE)
Project Start
2016-01-01
Project End
2019-12-31
Budget Start
2016-01-01
Budget End
2016-12-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Miami VA Health Care System
Department
Type
DUNS #
079275714
City
Miami
State
FL
Country
United States
Zip Code
33125
Roeksomtawin, Somphon; Navasumrit, Panida; Waraprasit, Somchamai et al. (2018) Decreased argininosuccinate synthetase expression in Thai patients with cholangiocarcinoma and the effects of ADI-PEG20 treatment in CCA cell lines. Oncol Lett 16:1529-1538
Li, Ying-Ying; Feun, Lynn G; Thongkum, Angkana et al. (2017) Autophagic Mechanism in Anti-Cancer Immunity: Its Pros and Cons for Cancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 18:
Thongkum, Angkana; Wu, Chunjing; Li, Ying-Ying et al. (2017) The Combination of Arginine Deprivation and 5-Fluorouracil Improves Therapeutic Efficacy in Argininosuccinate Synthetase Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 18:
Li, Ying-Ying; Wu, Chunjing; Shah, Sumedh S et al. (2017) Degradation of AMPK-?1 sensitizes BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells to arginine deprivation. Mol Oncol 11:1806-1825
Long, Yan; Tsai, Wen-Bin; Wang, Dajuan et al. (2017) Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1) is a common metabolic marker of chemosensitivity for targeted arginine- and glutamine-starvation therapy. Cancer Lett 388:54-63
Tsai, Wen-Bin; Long, Yan; Chang, Jeffrey T et al. (2017) Chromatin remodeling system p300-HDAC2-Sin3A is involved in Arginine Starvation-Induced HIF-1? Degradation at the ASS1 promoter for ASS1 Derepression. Sci Rep 7:10814
Wangpaichitr, Medhi; Wu, Chunjing; Li, Ying Ying et al. (2017) Exploiting ROS and metabolic differences to kill cisplatin resistant lung cancer. Oncotarget 8:49275-49292
Li, Ying-Ying; Wu, Chunjing; Chen, Shu-Mei et al. (2016) BRAF inhibitor resistance enhances vulnerability to arginine deprivation in melanoma. Oncotarget 7:17665-80
Tsai, W-B; Long, Y; Park, J-R et al. (2016) Gas6/Axl is the sensor of arginine-auxotrophic response in targeted chemotherapy with arginine-depleting agents. Oncogene 35:1632-42
Feun, Lynn G; Kuo, Macus Tien; Savaraj, Niramol (2015) Arginine deprivation in cancer therapy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 18:78-82

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12 publications