The proposed research uses neurally-inspired models as a basis for understanding perception of print, the crux of reading ability. The mathematical basis of these models is dynamic systems theory; the basis for comparison is recurrent feedback. The framework is applied in widely used laboratory reading tasks with skilled, developmentally dyslexic and acquired dyslexic readers (stroke patients). The experiments build on previous demonstrations that phonology plays a key role in reading. Experiment 1 tests for """"""""feedback"""""""" effects of phonology for skilled readers in a naming task. Feedback effects are found when a spelling that """"""""could have"""""""" been presented (e.g., you """"""""could"""""""" spell HEAP with two Es as in DEEP), influences performance on the word (HEAP) that is presented (i.e., performance is poorer in simple reading tasks when a Word's phonology can feed back multiple spellings). Experiment 1's design is a 2 (feedback consistent vs. inconsistent) x 2 (feedforward consistent vs. inconsistent) design that also tests for interaction effects with traditional feedforward consistency. Experiment 2 extends the feedback x feedforward design of Experiment 1 to lexical decision and adds a third between- subject factor, nonword lexicality (illegal vs. legal vs. pseudohomophone foils), that tests for strategy effects. Experiment 3 tests whether developmental dyslexics confuse word and nonword homophones based on their phonology (e.g.1 ROWS or ROZE falsely recognized as ROSE). Experiment 4 tests whether frequency effects of homophones (ROSE) are mediated by sound-alike mates (ROWS) in categorization performance by developmental dyslexic subjects. Experiment 5 extends the feedforward x feedback consistency effect to naming and lexical decision by acquired dyslexic (stroke) patients. Experiments 6 and 7 use a novel time-series method to test for on-line effects of strategic control. Manipulations of strategic control are operationalized as continuous changes, during the course of an experiment, in task demands or stimulus contexts. Continuous changes in strategic factors can result in abrupt, qualitative changes in behavior. In Experiments 6 and 7, the manipulations of strategic control are effectively manipulations of task difficulty. These experiments are prototypes for a much broader application of this new method. They define a starting point for studies of on-line """"""""cognitive dynamics.""""""""

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Type
Research Scientist Development Award - Research (K02)
Project #
5K02NS001905-02
Application #
2445665
Study Section
NST-2 Subcommittee (NST)
Program Officer
Broman, Sarah H
Project Start
1996-08-27
Project End
2001-06-30
Budget Start
1997-07-01
Budget End
1998-06-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1997
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Arizona State University-Tempe Campus
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
188435911
City
Tempe
State
AZ
Country
United States
Zip Code
85287
Moreno, Miguel A; Buchanan, Lori; Van Orden, Guy C (2002) Variability in aphasic patients' response times. Brain Cogn 48:469-74
Farrar 4th, W T; Van Orden, G C; Hamouz, V (2001) When SOFA primes TOUCH: interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in ""semantically mediated"" phonological priming. Mem Cognit 29:530-9
Vanhoy, M; Van Orden, G C (2001) Pseudohomophones and word recognition. Mem Cognit 29:522-9
Gibbs, P; Van Orden, G C (1998) Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1162-87