Despite active repair and proofreading mechanisms, the replication machinery encounters unrepaired lesions and other forms of replication stress every cell division cycle. Therefore, completing DNA replication faithfully requires specialized replication stress response and error correction mechanisms. Replication fork remodeling by DNA translocases and nucleases can stabilize and repair damaged replication forks while mismatch repair enzymes can correct polymerase errors. However, inactivation or improper regulation of these enzymes generates DNA sequence changes that fuel cancer development. For example, inactivation of mismatch repair (MMR) is the most frequent cause of inherited cancers. Furthermore, oncogenes generate elevated levels of replication stress. While the genetic instability that results from these changes can promote tumorigenesis, it also makes cancer cells more dependent on the remaining replication stress response and repair pathways. Thus, these properties of cancer cells provide therapeutic opportunities that can be exploited by both traditional chemotherapeutic and radiation therapies that target DNA and newer agents like PARP inhibitors that more selectively utilize synthetic lethality to kill cancer cells. The guiding principle of this project is that understanding how replication stress and fork repair activities work in normal and cancer cells is critical to understand both the etiology of cancer and to develop and deploy new therapies. A five-member team of investigators with expertise spanning structural biology, biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology will focus on the key regulatory nodes that direct replication-associated repair activities. We will capitalize on the progress made in the last funding period, the ongoing research in project member laboratories, and the synergy created by employing multiple experimental approaches to address the following specific aims: (1) define the mechanisms by which the fork remodeling proteins ZRANB3, HLTF, and SMARCAL1 repair damaged replication forks; (2) define the unique replication-associated cellular functions of fork remodeling proteins; and (3) define mechanisms controlling nuclease activities at replication forks. Collaborations with other SBDR projects will ensure the highest impact of our studies. For example, we will work with project 1 to understand RPA function, project 3 to examine activities of HRR proteins in fork repair, project 4 to explore the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors, and project 5 to examine the role of MRN proteins at replication forks.

Public Health Relevance

Project 2 ? Replication Fork Repair PROJECT NARRATIVE Defects in replication-associated repair activities cause cancer. Completion of this project will discover mechanisms ensuring accurate genetic inheritance and may assist in the future translation of these discoveries into the clinic to benefit cancer patients.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA092584-20
Application #
10003199
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Project Start
2001-09-27
Project End
2021-08-31
Budget Start
2020-09-01
Budget End
2021-08-31
Support Year
20
Fiscal Year
2020
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Department
Type
DUNS #
078576738
City
Berkeley
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94720
Tsai, Chi-Lin; Tainer, John A (2018) Robust Production, Crystallization, Structure Determination, and Analysis of [Fe-S] Proteins: Uncovering Control of Electron Shuttling and Gating in the Respiratory Metabolism of Molybdopterin Guanine Dinucleotide Enzymes. Methods Enzymol 599:157-196
Ogorzalek, Tadeusz L; Hura, Greg L; Belsom, Adam et al. (2018) Small angle X-ray scattering and cross-linking for data assisted protein structure prediction in CASP 12 with prospects for improved accuracy. Proteins 86 Suppl 1:202-214
Langelier, Marie-France; Zandarashvili, Levani; Aguiar, Pedro M et al. (2018) NAD+ analog reveals PARP-1 substrate-blocking mechanism and allosteric communication from catalytic center to DNA-binding domains. Nat Commun 9:844
Crickard, J Brooks; Greene, Eric C (2018) Biochemical attributes of mitotic and meiotic presynaptic complexes. DNA Repair (Amst) :
Bhat, Kamakoti P; Krishnamoorthy, Archana; Dungrawala, Huzefa et al. (2018) RADX Modulates RAD51 Activity to Control Replication Fork Protection. Cell Rep 24:538-545
Sallmyr, Annahita; Tomkinson, Alan E (2018) Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by mammalian alternative end-joining pathways. J Biol Chem 293:10536-10546
Warren, Garrett M; Stein, Richard A; Mchaourab, Hassane S et al. (2018) Movement of the RecG Motor Domain upon DNA Binding Is Required for Efficient Fork Reversal. Int J Mol Sci 19:
Moiani, Davide; Ronato, Daryl A; Brosey, Chris A et al. (2018) Targeting Allostery with Avatars to Design Inhibitors Assessed by Cell Activity: Dissecting MRE11 Endo- and Exonuclease Activities. Methods Enzymol 601:205-241
Polyzos, Aris A; Wood, Nigel I; Williams, Paul et al. (2018) XJB-5-131-mediated improvement in physiology and behaviour of the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease is age- and sex- dependent. PLoS One 13:e0194580
Schneidman-Duhovny, Dina; Hammel, Michal (2018) Modeling Structure and Dynamics of Protein Complexes with SAXS Profiles. Methods Mol Biol 1764:449-473

Showing the most recent 10 out of 484 publications