The long-term goal of this project is to understand why infants' responses to sound change as they get older. Specifically, the aims are to evaluate how the acoustic properties of the ear, maturation of the nervous system, and maturation of factors such as attention and motivation affect auditory behavior during development. Three questions are addressed. First, why do infants require higher intensities than adults do to detect a sound? Measures of the acoustic properties of the infant ear, evoked potential measures of neural function, and behavioral detection performance will be examined to answer this question. Second, why do infants seem unable to follow rapid changes in sounds over time? Behavioral performance in detecting gaps in noise and in detecting amplitude modulation of sound will be compared to two different evoked potential measures of the same abilities. Third, why do young infants seem less able than adults to respond selectively to one frequency component of a complex sound? Tuning curves, a measure of auditory frequency resolution, will be measured behaviorally and using the auditory brainstem response in the same infants to address this issue. The logic behind all of the proposed experiments is that a combination of measures at different levels of analysis can provide considerably more information about the mechanisms responsible for development than any of the measures alone. By evaluating both sensory and nonsensory contributions to auditory response, this approach will provide information that is important in designing effective habilitation for hearing-impaired children, as well as helping to explain the course of normal auditory development.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
1996
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Werner, Lynne A; Levi, Ellen C; Keefe, Douglas H (2010) Ear-canal wideband acoustic transfer functions of adults and two- to nine-month-old infants. Ear Hear 31:587-98
Burns, Edward M (2009) Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 125:3166-76
Chen, Zhiqiang; Mikulec, Anthony A; McKenna, Michael J et al. (2006) A method for intracochlear drug delivery in the mouse. J Neurosci Methods 150:67-73
Zettner, Erika M; Folsom, Richard C (2003) Transient emission suppression tuning curve attributes in relation to psychoacoustic threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2031-41
Lippe, W R; Zirpel, L; Stone, J S (2002) Muscarinic receptors modulate intracellular Ca(2+) concentration in hyaline cells of the chicken basilar papilla. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188:381-95
Werner, L A; Folsom, R C; Mancl, L R et al. (2001) Human auditory brainstem response to temporal gaps in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:737-50
Iverson, P; Kuhl, P K (2000) Perceptual magnet and phoneme boundary effects in speech perception: do they arise from a common mechanism? Percept Psychophys 62:874-86
Lurie, D I; Solca, F; Fischer, E H et al. (2000) Tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 immunoreactivity increases in a subset of astrocytes following deafferentation of the chicken auditory brainstem. J Comp Neurol 421:199-214
Kato, B M; Rubel, E W (1999) Glutamate regulates IP3-type and CICR stores in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 81:1587-96
Dorn, P A; Piskorski, P; Gorga, M P et al. (1999) Predicting audiometric status from distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multivariate analyses. Ear Hear 20:149-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 64 publications