The Prostate Cancer Program (PCaP) consists of 50 members (30 primary, 18 associate, 2 adjunct) from 16 departments. The program is led by Dr. Christopher J. Logothetis, an internationally recognized medical oncologist, and co-led by Drs. Timothy C. Thompson, a laboratory scientist, and Filippo Giancotti, an accomplished physician-scientist. The major scientific goal of the PCaP is to build on our understanding of prostate cancer to develop more effective treatment and improve standard of care. The program is organized around 3 themes: 1) Biomarkers for Progression and Prediction; 2) Targeting the Immune and Non-immune Components of the Microenvironment, including the immune component; and 3) Targeting Cancer Cell Signaling. Each theme is addressed by a specific aim.
Aim 1 : To develop new tests from blood, urine, and tumor tissues that predict tumor recurrence, progression, and sensitivity or resistance to existing and novel therapies.
Aim 2 : To understand tumor cell-host interactions and translate this knowledge into the development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting the microenvironment.
Aim 3 : To target prostate cancer cell signaling with novel single agents and with combinations of agents used sequentially or concurrently. The annual direct peer- reviewed funding totals $3,693,347, including a Prostate Cancer SPORE, and $2,204,086 (60%) is from NCI grants. Since the last submission, the program has authored 350 published papers, of which 183 (52%) are intra- programmatic, 112 (32%) are inter-programmatic, and 245 (70%) are external collaborations. Forty-nine percent of publications appeared in journals with IF >5 and 23% appeared in journals with IF >10, including Cancer Cell, Lancet Oncol, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, Nature, N Engl J Med, Cell, Nat Genet, J Natl Cancer Inst, Sci Transl Med, and J Clin Oncol. Program members use all 14 shared resources. Over the past 6 years, the PCaP has 1) discovered biomarkers that predict responsiveness or initial/acquired resistance to the second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors; 2) identified biomarkers associated with the ?aggressive variant? prostate cancer phenotype that predict response to platinum-based combinations in clinical and co-clinical models; 3) discovered immunotherapy targets in prostate cancer (e.g., VISTA) that are expressed on T cells and antigen- presenting cells, including macrophages; 4) linked myeloid-derived suppressor cells with immune checkpoint blockade resistance in prostate cancer; 5) identified FGF as a target in prostate cancer, providing a mechanism of action for the VEGFR and c-met inhibitor cabozantinib; 6) elucidated the impact of cross-talk between PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in regulating efficacy of targeted therapy for prostate cancer; 7) identified prostate cancer vulnerability to PARP inhibitors regulated by androgen inhibitor-mediated BRCAness; and 8) identified cancer-induced transition of endothelial cells to cells with osteoblastic function and associated them with bone metastases.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA016672-44
Application #
9997827
Study Section
Subcommittee I - Transistion to Independence (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2020-07-01
Budget End
2021-06-30
Support Year
44
Fiscal Year
2020
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
800772139
City
Houston
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
77030
Viswanathan, Chitra; Faria, Silvana; Devine, Catherine et al. (2018) [18F]-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose-PET Assessment of Cervical Cancer. PET Clin 13:165-177
Debnam, James M; Chi, Tzehping L; Ketonen, Leena et al. (2018) Superiority of Multidetector Computed Tomography With 3-Dimensional Volume Rendering Over Plain Radiography in the Assessment of Spinal Surgical Instrumentation Complications in Patients With Cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr :
Patel, V K; Lamothe, B; Ayres, M L et al. (2018) Pharmacodynamics and proteomic analysis of acalabrutinib therapy: similarity of on-target effects to ibrutinib and rationale for combination therapy. Leukemia 32:920-930
Ravandi, Farhad; Ritchie, Ellen K; Sayar, Hamid et al. (2018) Phase 3 results for vosaroxin/cytarabine in the subset of patients ?60 years old with refractory/early relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 103:e514-e518
Assi, Rita; Kantarjian, Hagop M; Kadia, Tapan M et al. (2018) Final results of a phase 2, open-label study of indisulam, idarubicin, and cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer 124:2758-2765
Yam, Clinton; Murthy, Rashmi K; Valero, Vicente et al. (2018) A phase II study of tipifarnib and gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer. Invest New Drugs 36:299-306
Lacourt, Tamara E; Vichaya, Elisabeth G; Escalante, Carmen et al. (2018) An effort expenditure perspective on cancer-related fatigue. Psychoneuroendocrinology 96:109-117
Ni, Haiwen; Shirazi, Fazal; Baladandayuthapani, Veerabhadran et al. (2018) Targeting Myddosome Signaling in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia with the Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 1/4 Inhibitor R191. Clin Cancer Res 24:6408-6420
Neelapu, Sattva S; Tummala, Sudhakar; Kebriaei, Partow et al. (2018) Toxicity management after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: one size does not fit 'ALL'. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:218
Cortes, Jorge; Tamura, Kenji; DeAngelo, Daniel J et al. (2018) Phase I studies of AZD1208, a proviral integration Moloney virus kinase inhibitor in solid and haematological cancers. Br J Cancer 118:1425-1433

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12418 publications