Addressing new research issues in studies of community-based drug abuse treatment requires very sophisticated theory and concepts, research designs, measurement, and analysis strategies. Few individual grant or contract studies have had or will have sufficient resources to systematically and comprehensively consider the complex methodological issues that often threaten the integrity of research results in community-based treatment research. This research is necessarily conducted outside clinical research centers and addresses basic applied issues rather than the generation of new therapeutic approaches. The primary goal of the Center for the Advancement of Treatment Evaluation Methods will be to identify, develop, assemble, apply, and disseminate knowledge about state-of-the-art methods for research on drug abuse treatment in typical community-based programs. The secondary goal of this Center will be to understand the nature and extent of bias and error resulting from the use of a specific methodology and the integrity of its application in community-based treatment research. To accomplish these goals, the Center will coordinate and integrate four projects: To examine the nature and extent of bias and error due to recall and denial in self-reports of client behavior before, during, and after treatment; To determine the sensitivity of estimates of treatment effects by assessing the impacts of various treats to the integrity (such as attrition, compliance, self-selection) of randomized field trials, quasi-experimental, and clinical epidemiological evaluation designs; To consider the sensitivity of common multivariate analytic strategies to alternative models specification, data correction procedures, and the use of different statistical techniques; and To expand the refine benefit-cost and cost-effectiveness frameworks by incorporating additional outcomes (such as health and employment) and more detailed cost estimates for programs, service components, and clients. Initially the Center will focus the methodological work on two key research issues: How do client impairments affect treatment process and outcome? How does the treatment structure and process affect outcomes? Two other projects, included in the original Center application of March, 1991 were resubmitted as independent grant applications and, if funded, will become components of the Center. To assess the reliability and validity of self-report measures of psychiatric, vocational, medical and other impairments for research, clinical and program management uses; To identify the most appropriate ways to measure the nature of treatment structure and process across multisite samples of programs providing the major types of treatment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
5P50DA006990-04
Application #
2119278
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SRCD (25))
Project Start
1992-09-30
Project End
1996-08-31
Budget Start
1995-09-01
Budget End
1996-08-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
1995
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Research Triangle Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
131606022
City
Research Triangle Park
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27709
Zarkin, G A; Cates, S C; Bala, M V (2000) Estimating the willingness to pay for drug abuse treatment: a pilot study. J Subst Abuse Treat 18:149-59
Dennis, M L; Perl, H I; Huebner, R B et al. (2000) Twenty-five strategies for improving the design, implementation and analysis of health services research related to alcohol and other drug abuse treatment. Addiction 95 Suppl 3:S281-308
Rogers, S M; Miller, H G; Turner, C F (1998) Effects of interview mode on bias in survey measurements of drug use: do respondent characteristics make a difference? Subst Use Misuse 33:2179-200
Rounds-Bryant, J L; Flynn, P M; Craighead, L W (1997) Relationship between self-efficacy perceptions and in-treatment drug use among regular cocaine users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 23:383-95
Turner, C F; Miller, H G (1997) Monitoring trends in drug use: strategies for the 21st century. Subst Use Misuse 32:2093-103
French, M T; Dunlap, L J; Zarkin, G A et al. (1997) A structured instrument for estimating the economic cost of drug abuse treatment. The Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP). J Subst Abuse Treat 14:445-55
French, M T; Dunlap, L J; Galinis, D N et al. (1996) Health care reforms and managed care for substance abuse services: findings from eleven case studies. J Public Health Policy 17:181-203
Adair, E B; Craddock, S G; Miller, H G et al. (1996) Quality of treatment data. Reliability over time of self-reports given by clients in treatment for substance abuse. J Subst Abuse Treat 13:145-9
French, M T; Mauskopf, J A; Teague, J L et al. (1996) Estimating the dollar value of health outcomes from drug-abuse interventions. Med Care 34:890-910
French, M T; Martin, R F (1996) The costs of drug abuse consequences: a summary of research findings. J Subst Abuse Treat 13:453-66

Showing the most recent 10 out of 18 publications