This competitive renewal proposal extends the work of our previous NIAAA study (RO1-AA09050), which documented that over one-third of trauma center patients had a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Analysis of screening tests revealed that the CAGE and two questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) can identify which patients require medical management for an alcohol use problem, other drinkers who are at risk of future injury, and those without an alcohol problem. The long-term objectives are to reduce drinking consequences and alcohol use in at-risk trauma center patients. We plan to conduct a two-arm randomized clinical trial in which trauma patients will be assigned to either a Personalized Motivational Intervention (PMI) Treatment Group or an Information and Advice (IA) Control Group. Primary Aim 1 is to assess whether a PMI reduces alcohol-related consequences better than IA. This assessment is based on the """"""""SIP+6"""""""" questionnaire (DrInC instrument modified for trauma patients). Primary Aim 2 is to assess whether the PMI reduces alcohol consumption based on OASAS (Office of Alcoholism and Substance Services) Drinking History Questions. As a secondary goal, patient characteristics, such as stages of change and decisional balance, will be assessed regarding their impact on the effectiveness of the intervention. By clinical protocol, approximately 2800 unselected, consecutive patients will be screened. Those requiring medical management and those without alcohol problems will be excluded from study. The remaining 36 percent of patients (n=894) will be eligible for study. The screener will obtain consent. Then, Intake and Interventional Specialists (IISs) will administer the SIP+6, OASAS questions, and measures to assess patient characteristics and will deliver PMI or IA, based on randomization. The PMI consists of four components personalized with intake data: a 20- to 30-minute motivational intervention session in the trauma center, personalized feedback letter sent 2 weeks after contact, and two follow-up telephone contacts at 3 and 6 weeks. IA will consist of a brochure describing the risks of excessive drinking followed by one telephone contact at 3 weeks by the IIS. Outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months via telephone interviews in which intake measures will be repeated, new injuries documented, and compliance and satisfaction with treatment services assessed. The follow-up interviewer will be blinded to group assignment in the clinical trial. It is estimated that more than 80 percent of patients (n=572+) will complete the entire study protocol. The validity of self reports will be assessed by interviewing collaterals from 100 randomly selected patients in each of the intervention and control groups at 6 and 12 months.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AA009050-06
Application #
6371337
Study Section
Health Services Research Review Subcommittee (AA)
Project Start
1993-09-30
Project End
2003-05-31
Budget Start
2001-06-01
Budget End
2002-05-31
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$515,479
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Maryland Baltimore
Department
Surgery
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
003255213
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21201
Ryb, Gabriel E; Dischinger, Patricia C; Diclemente, Carlo et al. (2011) Impulsive or depressive personality traits do not impede behavioral change after brief alcohol interventions. J Addict Dis 30:54-62
Ryb, Gabriel E; Dischinger, Patricia C; Smith, Gordon S et al. (2008) School suspensions, injury-prone behaviors, and injury history. J Trauma 65:1106-11;discussion 1111-3
Ryb, Gabriel E; Dischinger, Patricia; Kufera, Joseph et al. (2007) Smoking is a marker of risky behaviors independent of substance abuse in injured drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 8:248-52
Soderstrom, Carl A; DiClemente, Carlo C; Dischinger, Patricia C et al. (2007) A controlled trial of brief intervention versus brief advice for at-risk drinking trauma center patients. J Trauma 62:1102-11;discussion 1111-2
Martins, Silvia S; Copersino, Marc L; Soderstrom, Carl A et al. (2007) Sociodemographic characteristics associated with substance use status in a trauma inpatient population. J Addict Dis 26:53-62
Martins, Silvia S; Copersino, Marc L; Soderstrom, Carl A et al. (2007) Risk of psychoactive substance dependence among substance users in a trauma inpatient population. J Addict Dis 26:71-7
Ryb, Gabriel E; Dischinger, Patricia C; Kufera, Joseph A et al. (2007) Social, behavioral and driving characteristics of injured pedestrians: a comparison with other unintentional trauma patients. Accid Anal Prev 39:313-8
Ryb, Gabriel E; Dischinger, Patricia C; Kufera, Joseph A et al. (2006) Risk perception and impulsivity: association with risky behaviors and substance abuse disorders. Accid Anal Prev 38:567-73
Dill, Patricia L; Wells-Parker, Elisabeth; Soderstrom, Carl A (2004) The emergency care setting for screening and intervention for alcohol use problems among injured and high-risk drivers: a review. Traffic Inj Prev 5:278-91
Soderstrom, C A; Ballesteros, M F; Dischinger, P C et al. (2001) Alcohol/drug abuse, driving convictions, and risk-taking dispositions among trauma center patients. Accid Anal Prev 33:771-82

Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications