The primary aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an innovative and replicable model for disseminating practice guidelines emanating from NIH Consensus Development Conferences on the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. We will use a randomized controlled design in a voluntary consortium of hospitals (N = 40) in Minnesota. The intervention will consist of (a) technical assistance to locally recruited oncology opinion leaders who will provide presentations and informal peer consultations, (b) dissemination of attractively illustrated and concise practice guidelines, and (c) group performance feedback by local opinion leaders to physicians. The design and content of this intervention will be informed by an initial data collection phase conducted to document the extent to which practice does not correspond with guidelines and to identify factors associated with non-compliance. During this initial phase we will: (1) obtain baseline data on the extent to which current practice corresponds to treatments identified as effective in the 1990 guidelines for care of breast cancer patients as well as to treatments recognized in earlier (1979, 1980, 1985) guidelines; (2) determine the degree to which a) special medical circumstances, b) patient preferences, c) lack of physician knowledge, and d) physician disagreement account for noncompliance with these guidelines; and (3) identify patient, provider, and hospital characteristics associated with care that does not comply with guidelines. Using the information gained from the first phase of the study we will formulate the content of our intervention and training materials which will be used by opinion leaders in their presentations to and discussions with providers. Following the implementation of our intervention we will assess whether the proportion of patients who receive care that corresponds with the guidelines is greater at intervention hospitals than at non-intervention hospitals, controlling for baseline performance, and determine the cost of the dissemination program.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA057755-02
Application #
3202095
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SRC (62))
Project Start
1992-09-30
Project End
1995-09-29
Budget Start
1993-09-30
Budget End
1994-09-29
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Harvard University
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
082359691
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02115
Keating, Nancy L; Weeks, Jane C; Borbas, Catherine et al. (2003) Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:225-31
Keating, Nancy L; Guadagnoli, Edward; Landrum, Mary Beth et al. (2002) Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 20:1473-9
Keating, N L; Weeks, J C; Landrum, M B et al. (2001) Discussion of treatment options for early-stage breast cancer: effect of provider specialty on type of surgery and satisfaction. Med Care 39:681-91
Guadagnoli, E; Soumerai, S B; Gurwitz, J H et al. (2000) Improving discussion of surgical treatment options for patients with breast cancer: local medical opinion leaders versus audit and performance feedback. Breast Cancer Res Treat 61:171-5
Guadagnoli, E; Shapiro, C L; Weeks, J C et al. (1998) The quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinoma: is it consistent with national guidelines? Cancer 83:302-9
Guadagnoli, E; Weeks, J C; Shapiro, C L et al. (1998) Use of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:101-6
Guadagnoli, E; Ward, P (1998) Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med 47:329-39
Guadagnoli, E; Shapiro, C; Gurwitz, J H et al. (1997) Age-related patterns of care: evidence against ageism in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2338-44
Barrand, N L; Schroeder, S A (1994) Lessons from the states. Inquiry 31:10-3