The objective of the proposed research is to gain further insights into marijuana's action on brain reward circuits and on dopamine (DA) and enkephalinergic mechanisms involved in marijuana, derive part of their abuse liability from neuropharmacological facilitation of brain reward circuits. During the period of previous NIDA grant support for this work, we demonstrated that delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC), the major psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, does the following: (1) lowers direct brain reward thresholds in the medial forebrain bundle, in a rat strain-specific fashion, (2) enhances presynaptic release of known to support brain reward, and (3) interacts noncompetitively with endogenous brain delta and Mu opioid receptors but not Kappa receptors, and the opioid receptor interaction of a series of cannabinoid analogs correlates crudely but not precisely with psychoactive potency. The general aim of the presently proposed work is to carry forward and extend all these findings.
The specific aims are to (1) extend ours studies of delta9-THC and analogs on direct brain reward as measured by electrical intracranial self- stimulation in laboratory rats; (2) extend our studies of the effects of delta9-THC and analogs on DA release, in forebrain DA loci supporting direct brain reward, as measured by both in vivo voltammetric electrochemistry and in vivo intracranial microdialysis; and (3) extend our studies of the interaction of delta9-THC and selected analogs with endogenous brain opioid receptors, as measured by receptor binding and quantitative autoradiography. A major aim running throughout is to learn the specific locus in the brain of the already-demonstrated delta9-TCH effects. This proposal addresses specific research needs stipulated in the NIDA Marijuana Research Announcement and in NIDA Grant Announcement DA-87- 24 (""""""""...studies are needed concerning the neurophysiological effects of marijuana, including potential sites and mechanisms of action.."""""""" """"""""...research areas of particular importance include...brain reward mechanisms""""""""). By adding to our understanding of marijuana's effects on one of the presumptive principal neurophysiological substrates of drug abuse liability, these studies should yield additional insight into fundamental brain mechanisms underlying marijuana's abuse potential, and to treatment possibilities for marijuana abuse. The health relatedness is clear, given that marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States, and given the evidence for health consequences of chronic marijuana abuse.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA003622-05
Application #
2116776
Study Section
Drug Abuse Biomedical Research Review Committee (DABR)
Project Start
1984-04-01
Project End
1993-11-30
Budget Start
1991-12-01
Budget End
1993-11-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
1992
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
009095365
City
Bronx
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10461
Gardner, Eliot L (2002) Addictive potential of cannabinoids: the underlying neurobiology. Chem Phys Lipids 121:267-90
Minabe, Y; Gardner, E L; Ashby Jr, C R (1998) Differential effects of chronic haloperidol administration on midbrain dopamine neurons in Sprague-Dawley, Fischer 344, and Lewis rats: an in vivo electrophysiological study. Synapse 29:269-71
Gardner, E L; Vorel, S R (1998) Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events. Neurobiol Dis 5:502-33
Gifford, A N; Gardner, E L; Ashby Jr, C R (1997) The effect of intravenous administration of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the activity of A10 dopamine neurons recorded in vivo in anesthetized rats. Neuropsychobiology 36:96-9
Chen, J; Marmur, R; Paredes, W et al. (1996) Systemic cocaine challenge after chronic cocaine treatment reveals sensitization of extracellular dopamine levels in nucleus accumbens but direct cocaine perfusion into nucleus accumbens does not: implications for the neural locus of cocaine sensitization Life Sci 58:PL139-46
Lepore, M; Liu, X; Savage, V et al. (1996) Genetic differences in delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced facilitation of brain stimulation reward as measured by a rate-frequency curve-shift electrical brain stimulation paradigm in three different rat strains. Life Sci 58:PL365-72
Lepore, M; Vorel, S R; Lowinson, J et al. (1995) Conditioned place preference induced by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol: comparison with cocaine, morphine, and food reward. Life Sci 56:2073-80
Gardner, E L; Chen, J; Paredes, W (1993) Overview of chemical sampling techniques. J Neurosci Methods 48:173-97
Chen, J; Marmur, R; Pulles, A et al. (1993) Ventral tegmental microinjection of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances ventral tegmental somatodendritic dopamine levels but not forebrain dopamine levels: evidence for local neural action by marijuana's psychoactive ingredient. Brain Res 621:65-70
Gardner, E L; Lowinson, J H (1991) Marijuana's interaction with brain reward systems: update 1991. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 40:571-80

Showing the most recent 10 out of 16 publications