Over 1.6 million adolescents in the United States meet criteria for substance use disorders (SUDs). Promising treatments for reducing the immediate and long-term negative effects of SUDs are available. However, deciding between outpatient, intensive outpatient, and residential services for adolescents needing treatment is complex, as it often requires a sequential, individualized approach. Those treating adolescents with SUDs must attend to the specific needs of adolescents and observe how their clients are responding to treatment and, in response, make choices about the types and duration of services they should receive. This type of sequential decision-making is imperative given the significant heterogeneity in how adolescents respond to treatment over time. In practice, these sequential decisions are often made without any empirical support. The American Society of Addiction Medicine's Patient Placement Criteria (ASAM PPC) was a major step forward in services planning for adults and adolescents but the empirical research foundations of the PPC are based primarily on adult, rather than adolescent, data [6-13]. Empirical work is needed to address this gap and evaluate decision rules that can lead to effective treatment services planning for adolescents with SUDs. The purpose of this five-year R01 study is to develop well-operationalized, empirically-supported sequences of decision rules-known as Adaptive Interventions (AIs)-to provide guidance for providers, families, and policymakers involved in making treatment services decisions for adolescent clients. AIs can improve clinical practice by guiding the placement of adolescents into the most appropriate treatment service at the appropriate time. To develop these AIs, we propose a novel, mixed-method approach. First, an iterative stakeholder engagement process will elucidate the complex issues in sequential treatment services decision-making; this formal process is a vital step for developing feasible AIs. Second, equipped with knowledge from our stakeholders, we will utilize modern statistical methods to empirically identify and then evaluate AIs using a large, observational dataset-funded by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT)-of over 24,000 adolescents in substance use treatment. Specifically, we aim to (1) understand how sequential decisions are made in current practice, and identify key components of feasible AIs with input from adolescent substance use providers, policymakers, researchers, and advocates; (2) empirically identify high-quality candidate AIs for adolescent clients; and (3) evaluate the relative effectiveness of the candidate AIs by examining their causal effect on relevant clinical outcomes. Identifying AIs that most effectively move youth between outpatient, intensive outpatient, and residential services is a complex but policy-relevant problem. Developing AIs from observational study data, by applying the modern methods proposed in our study will provide guidance to current practitioners and lay the foundation for subsequent experiments that can test candidate AIs in rigorous clinical trials.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed research aims to develop well-operationalized, empirically-supported sequences of decision rules-known as 'Adaptive Interventions' (AIs)-to provide guidance about substance-use services decisions for adolescent clients. These service-level AIs will build on the influential American Society of Addiction Medicine's Patient Placement Criteria (ASAM PPC) in order to provide individually-tailored decision rules for determining whether, how, or when to alter the type or duration of treatment services at critical decision points. In doing so, the research aims to greatly improve the scientific information upon which providers, families, and policymakers make decisions about which substance abuse treatment services should be recommended for a particular adolescent given their personal history and current disease severity.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA015697-09
Application #
9386740
Study Section
Health Services Organization and Delivery Study Section (HSOD)
Program Officer
Wiley, Tisha R A
Project Start
2003-04-05
Project End
2019-11-30
Budget Start
2017-12-01
Budget End
2019-11-30
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2018
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Rand Corporation
Department
Type
DUNS #
006914071
City
Santa Monica
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90401
Boruvka, Audrey; Almirall, Daniel; Witkiewitz, Katie et al. (2018) Assessing Time-Varying Causal Effect Moderation in Mobile Health. J Am Stat Assoc 113:1112-1121
Grant, Sean; Agniel, Denis; Almirall, Daniel et al. (2017) Developing adaptive interventions for adolescent substance use treatment settings: protocol of an observational, mixed-methods project. Addict Sci Clin Pract 12:35
Schuler, Megan S; Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S; Stuart, Elizabeth A (2014) ADDRESSING CONFOUNDING WHEN ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF LATENT CLASSES ON A DISTAL OUTCOME. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 14:232-254
Ramchand, Rajeev; Griffin, Beth Ann; Slaughter, Mary Ellen et al. (2014) Do improvements in substance use and mental health symptoms during treatment translate to long-term outcomes in the opposite domain? J Subst Abuse Treat 47:339-46
Schuler, Megan S; Griffin, Beth Ann; Ramchand, Rajeev et al. (2014) Effectiveness of treatment for adolescent substance use: is biological drug testing sufficient? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 75:358-70
Almirall, Daniel; Griffin, Beth Ann; McCaffrey, Daniel F et al. (2014) Time-varying effect moderation using the structural nested mean model: estimation using inverse-weighted regression with residuals. Stat Med 33:3466-87
Griffin, Beth Ann; Ramchand, Rajeev; Almirall, Daniel et al. (2014) Estimating the causal effects of cumulative treatment episodes for adolescents using marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Drug Alcohol Depend 136:69-78
McCaffrey, Daniel F; Lockwood, J R; Setodji, Claude M (2013) Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates. Biometrika 100:671-680
Almirall, Daniel; McCaffrey, Daniel F; Ramchand, Rajeev et al. (2013) Subgroups analysis when treatment and moderators are time-varying. Prev Sci 14:169-78
McCaffrey, Daniel F; Griffin, Beth Ann; Almirall, Daniel et al. (2013) A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Stat Med 32:3388-414

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications