Obesity is a major and growing health problem in the US. It affects more than 50 million Americans, causes significant morbidity (e.g. diabetes, hypertension), and contributes to increased mortality. New methods are thus much needed for delivering effective weight management serves to large numbers of people at a reasonable cost. The present research is designed to evaluate such weight management systems within the context of a managed care organization (MCO). A cohort of 1500 overweight members of an MCO will be identified and followed for 2 years. Five hundred (500) will be randomized to each of three experimental groups: 1) """"""""usual care"""""""" control, 2) mail-based intervention comprised of an interactive program of weight counseling through the mail, and 3) phone-based intervention comprised of an interactive program of weight counseling by phone. Participation in available programs will be optional. The weight management systems will be evaluated in terms of the proportion of members who choose to enroll and mean weight change. Program costs and medical care utilization will also be examined. It is hypothesized that MCO members assigned to both the phone-based and mail- based groups will enroll in those weight control programs at higher rates than members assigned to the control group do to programs available as """"""""usual care."""""""" It is also hypothesized that mean weight losses over 2 years among members who are offered mail-based and phone-based programs will be greater than in the control group. The proposed research is important because it focuses on long-term management of an important health problem in an applied setting (MCO) where such systems of long-term care might be realistically used. It also addresses important issues of cost and population outreach, and would provide a basis for determining whether such weight management systems are economically viable for primary health care providers.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DK053826-02
Application #
6164562
Study Section
Epidemiology and Disease Control Subcommittee 2 (EDC)
Program Officer
Yanovski, Susan Z
Project Start
1999-03-01
Project End
2004-02-29
Budget Start
2000-03-01
Budget End
2001-02-28
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
$663,613
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Public Health
DUNS #
168559177
City
Minneapolis
State
MN
Country
United States
Zip Code
55455
Dunn, C L; Hannan, P J; Jeffery, R W et al. (2006) The comparative and cumulative effects of a dietary restriction and exercise on weight loss. Int J Obes (Lond) 30:112-21
Linde, J A; Jeffery, R W; Levy, R L et al. (2005) Weight loss goals and treatment outcomes among overweight men and women enrolled in a weight loss trial. Int J Obes (Lond) 29:1002-5
Linde, Jennifer A; Jeffery, Robert W; French, Simone A et al. (2005) Self-weighing in weight gain prevention and weight loss trials. Ann Behav Med 30:210-6
Levy, Rona L; Linde, Jennifer A; Feld, Kayla A et al. (2005) The association of gastrointestinal symptoms with weight, diet, and exercise in weight-loss program participants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:992-6
Linde, J A; Jeffery, R W; Levy, R L et al. (2004) Binge eating disorder, weight control self-efficacy, and depression in overweight men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28:418-25
Jeffery, Robert W; McGuire, Maureen T; Brelje, Kerrin L et al. (2004) Recruitment to mail and telephone interventions for obesity in a managed care environment: the Weigh-To-Be project. Am J Manag Care 10:378-82
Jeffery, R W; Sherwood, N E; Brelje, K et al. (2003) Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be one-year outcomes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27:1584-92
Pronk, Nicolaas P; Boucher, Jackie L; Gehling, Eve et al. (2002) A platform for population-based weight management: description of a health plan-based integrated systems approach. Am J Manag Care 8:847-57