This proposal addresses the general question of how developmental processes are regulated at the level of gene expression. The specific goal is to investigate the mechanisms by which alternative RNA processing controls the sex-specific expression of a gene that regulates somatic sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. The doublesex (dsx) gene acts as a """"""""genetic switch""""""""; it is expressed in either a male- or female-specific mode, the choice of which directs the course of somatic sexual development. The regulation of dsx occurs through sex-specific RNA processing. To understand how this regulation occurs, a three-stage strategy is proposed: (i) Identify and characterize the dsx sequences required in cis for sex- specific RNA splicing. This will be done by in vivo studies using dsx minigene constructs. The effect of site-directed mutations on the minigene splicing pattern will define the organization and behavior of these sites. (ii) Determine how these sites function, i.e., do they bind trans-acting regulatory factors and are they involved in important secondary structures? These studies will utilize RNA-protein binding assays including gel mobility shift and protection experiments. (iii) Isolate and characterize the trans-acting factors. The proposed research will contribute to our understanding of a developmental process that is fundamental to all sexually reproducing organisms. Furthermore, the insights gained on the regulation of RNA processing will have substantial relevance to the study of a number of genes that are regulated in a similar manner. These include genes of major medical importance involving such processes as oncogenesis, viral regulation, and the immune system, among others.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM045843-03
Application #
3305299
Study Section
Molecular Biology Study Section (MBY)
Project Start
1991-08-01
Project End
1995-07-31
Budget Start
1993-08-01
Budget End
1994-07-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Iowa
Department
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
041294109
City
Iowa City
State
IA
Country
United States
Zip Code
52242
Hinson, S; Nagoshi, R N (2002) The involvement of ovarian tumour in the intracellular localization of Sex-lethal protein. Insect Mol Biol 11:241-8
Hinson, S; Pettus, J; Nagoshi, R N (1999) Regulatory and functional interactions between ovarian tumor and ovo during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech Dev 88:3-14
Hinson, S; Nagoshi, R N (1999) Regulatory and functional interactions between the somatic sex regulatory gene transformer and the germline genes ovo and ovarian tumor. Development 126:861-71
Johnson, E; Wayne, S; Nagoshi, R (1995) fs (1) Yb is required for ovary follicle cell differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster and has genetic interactions with the Notch group of neurogenic genes. Genetics 140:207-17
Rodesch, C; Geyer, P K; Patton, J S et al. (1995) Developmental analysis of the ovarian tumor gene during Drosophila oogenesis. Genetics 141:191-202
Wayne, S; Liggett, K; Pettus, J et al. (1995) Genetic characterization of small ovaries, a gene required in the soma for the development of the Drosophila ovary and the female germline. Genetics 139:1309-20
Roseman, R R; Johnson, E A; Rodesch, C K et al. (1995) A P element containing suppressor of hairy-wing binding regions has novel properties for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141:1061-74
Nagoshi, R N; Patton, J S; Bae, E et al. (1995) The somatic sex determines the requirement for ovarian tumor gene activity in the proliferation of the Drosophila germline. Development 121:579-87
Bae, E; Cook, K R; Geyer, P K et al. (1994) Molecular characterization of ovarian tumors in Drosophila. Mech Dev 47:151-64
Geyer, P K; Patton, J S; Rodesch, C et al. (1993) Genetic and molecular characterization of P element-induced mutations reveals that the Drosophila ovarian tumor gene has maternal activity and a variable null phenotype. Genetics 133:265-78