Incompatibilities between genomes are the source of reproductive isolation between species. Although genome incompatibilities are a central feature of the evolutionary process in sexual organisms, little is known about how they evolve or about their molecular, cellular, or developmental mechanisms. Genome incompatibilities are experimentally challenging. Within-species incompatibilities are often concealed by suppressors, and between-species incompatibilities are only revealed in interspecific crosses. Genome incompatibilities are also computationally challenging because they are insufficiently understood to be annotated even in complete genome sequences. Our long-term goal is to understand the phenotypic, functional, molecular, and evolutionary mechanisms of genome incompatibilities at a level that would allow them to be identified using comparative genomics and/or to be recreated in the laboratory. Our experimental approach enables the identification of incompatibility factors between two model species of Drosophila. The approach makes use of a series of genetically marked segments of the genome of D. mauritiana that have been introgressed into the genome of D. simulans. This material allows for a methodical analysis of genetic factors associated with hybrid male sterility. The innovative feature is that the visible markers in the transgene allow high-resolution genetic mapping. In this renewal application, we will test the hypothesis that one of the incompatibility factors (factor 9) corresponds to a gene that encodes a rapidly evolving, high-mobility group DNA-binding protein. We will use the same approach to identify and test candidate genes for incompatibility factor 2, which has already been localized to a fairly small region. Both incompatibility factors will be analyzed at the molecular, cellular, developmental, and population levels. We will also study how sex-ratio meiotic drive shapes levels and patterns of variation in and around the X-linked distorter Dox and its autosomal small-RNA suppressor Nmy. Both are novel genes not present in D. melanogaster. Relevance: The relevance of this research is that it will likely uncover novel molecular and cellular mechanisms that are not readily accessed or predicted by conventional studies in single species using classical genetics or computational approaches. Project Narrative: Genomes often evolve incompatibilities reflecting a conflict between genes or an inability for genes to interact successfully. Little is known about how genome incompatibilities arise, what drives their evolution, or what kinds of genes are involved. An experimental approach that allows small regions of one genome to be inserted into the genome of a related species enables the identification of incompatibility factors between two model species of Drosophila. Uncovering genome incompatibilities is likely to reveal novel molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie reproductive isolation between species.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM065169-08
Application #
8111702
Study Section
Genetic Variation and Evolution Study Section (GVE)
Program Officer
Eckstrand, Irene A
Project Start
2003-02-01
Project End
2013-07-31
Budget Start
2011-08-01
Budget End
2013-07-31
Support Year
8
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$329,314
Indirect Cost
Name
Harvard University
Department
Biology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
082359691
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138
Meiklejohn, Colin D; Coolon, Joseph D; Hartl, Daniel L et al. (2014) The roles of cis- and trans-regulation in the evolution of regulatory incompatibilities and sexually dimorphic gene expression. Genome Res 24:84-95
Sackton, Timothy B; Corbett-Detig, Russell B; Nagaraju, Javaregowda et al. (2014) Positive selection drives faster-Z evolution in silkmoths. Evolution 68:2331-42
Lemos, Bernardo; Branco, Alan T; Jiang, Pan-Pan et al. (2014) Genome-wide gene expression effects of sex chromosome imprinting in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 4:1-10
Corbett-Detig, Russell B; Zhou, Jun; Clark, Andrew G et al. (2013) Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504:135-7
Branco, A T; Tao, Y; Hartl, D L et al. (2013) Natural variation of the Y chromosome suppresses sex ratio distortion and modulates testis-specific gene expression in Drosophila simulans. Heredity (Edinb) 111:8-15
Rogers, Rebekah L; Hartl, Daniel L (2012) Chimeric genes as a source of rapid evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol 29:517-29
Ponce, Rita; Martinsen, Lene; Vicente, Luís M et al. (2012) Novel genes from formation to function. Int J Evol Biol 2012:821645
Geiler-Samerotte, Kerry A; Dion, Michael F; Budnik, Bogdan A et al. (2011) Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:680-5
Zhou, Jun; Lemos, Bernardo; Dopman, Erik B et al. (2011) Copy-number variation: the balance between gene dosage and expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol Evol 3:1014-24
Araripe, Luciana O; Montenegro, Horacio; Lemos, Bernardo et al. (2010) Fine-scale genetic mapping of a hybrid sterility factor between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana: the varied and elusive functions of ""speciation genes"". BMC Evol Biol 10:385

Showing the most recent 10 out of 21 publications