Principal Investigator/Program Director (Last, first, middle): Farrell, Michael, H. RESEARCH &RELATED Other Project Information 1. * Are Human Subjects Involved? l Yes m No 1.a. If YES to Human Subjects Is the IRB review Pending? l Yes m No IRB Approval Date: Exemption Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Human Subject Assurance Number 00000820 2. * Are Vertebrate Animals Used? m Yes l No 2.a. If YES to Vertebrate Animals Is the IACUC review Pending? m Yes m No IACUC Approval Date: Animal Welfare Assurance Number 3. * Is proprietary/privileged information m Yes l No included in the application? 4.a.* Does this project have an actual or potential impact on m Yes l No the environment? 4.b. If yes, please explain: 4.c. If this project has an actual or potential impact on the environment, has an exemption been authorized or an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental impact statement (EIS) been performed? m Yes m No 4.d. If yes, please explain: 5.a.* Does this project involve activities outside the U.S. or m Yes l No partnership with International Collaborators? 5.b. If yes, identify countries: 5.c. Optional Explanation: 6. * Project Summary/Abstract 6810-Project_summary.pdf Mime Type: application/pdf 7. * Project Narrative 1462-Project_narrative.pdf Mime Type: application/pdf 8. Bibliography &References Cited 3744-Final_references.pdf Mime Type: application/pdf 9. Facilities &Other Resources 2783-Facilities_and_other_resources.pdfMime Type: application/pdf 10. Equipment 2052-Equipment.pdf Mime Type: application/pdf 11. Other Attachments 7162-Sparapani_Biosketch_-_March_200M7i.mpdefType: application/pdf 11. Other Attachments 4149-christopher_biosketch.pdf Mime Type: application/pdf Tracking Number: Other Information Page 6 OMB Number: 4040-0001 Expiration Date: 04/30/2008 Principal Investigator/Program Director (Last, first, middle): Farrell, Michael, H. BACKGROUND: Many authors have raised ethical, legal, and social concerns about the use of screening tests that also identify genomic information not immediately relevant to a disease. Newborn screening identifies cystic fibrosis (CF) and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy (SCH) early, but at the cost of psychological harm that develops in a substantial minority of parents whose infants are found to be heterozygous for CF or SCH. Primary care providers'limited genetic knowledge and communication skills may then lead to disparities in communication outcomes. This project is intended to help public health to develop a mechanism for early identification and treatment of psychosocial problems that develop after newborn genetic screening.
AIMS : [Aim 1] To closely examine and clarify the communication experience of parents after newborn screening identifies an infant as a carrier for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis, including [1a] the frequency of ideal communication behaviors likely to be experienced in primary care, and [1b] knowledge, misconceptions, scores on Marteau's 6-item version of the Spielberger state-anxiety subscale and the vulnerable baby scale. [Aim 2] To investigate factors that may influence parents'psychosocial and cognitive outcomes after newborn screening identifies an infant as a carrier for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis, including [2a] the frequency of ideal communication behaviors likely to be experienced in primary care, [2b-c] parents'report about counseling from the primary care provider and other sources, and [2d] interaction effects with other factors such as parents' reported prior knowledge and individual characteristics of parents and providers. METHODS: This project will be conducted under statutory authority of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services. The study will recruit parents and primary care providers of infants found via newborn screening to be heterozygous for SCH or CF will be recruited using a series of mailings and telephone calls designed to maximize safety and respect for privacy. Investigators will (a) contact primary care providers and invite them to rehearse on tape what will be said to parents, and (b) conduct a telephone interview with parents 4 months later to ask about anxiety, misconceptions and other psychosocial problems. Interview transcripts will be abstracted to obtain process and outcome data using explicit-criteria methods from previous studies. Anonymous written surveys will be used to evaluate the interview process. SIGNIFICANCE: It is hypothesized that a substantial minority of parents experience psychological or cognitive problems after newborn screening and that many primary care providers fail to adequately communicate screening results. This study may be able to shed better light on associations between these two problems, and also demonstrate a statewide mechanism for following up on psychosocial risks. Progress in this area may address many ethical concerns and generalize to other areas of communication in health care. Project Description Page 7

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
3R01HL086691-02S1
Application #
7837443
Study Section
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Human Genetics Study Section (ELS)
Program Officer
Werner, Ellen
Project Start
2009-07-01
Project End
2011-06-30
Budget Start
2009-07-01
Budget End
2011-06-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$336,885
Indirect Cost
Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
937639060
City
Milwaukee
State
WI
Country
United States
Zip Code
53226
Ahmad, Nadia Y; Farrell, Michael H (2014) Linguistic markers of emotion in mothers of sickle cell carrier infants: what are they and what do they mean? Patient Educ Couns 94:128-33
Farrell, Michael H; Christopher, Stephanie A (2013) Frequency of high-quality communication behaviors used by primary care providers of heterozygous infants after newborn screening. Patient Educ Couns 90:226-32
La Pean, Alison; Farrell, Michael H; Eskra, Kerry L et al. (2013) Effects of immediate telephone follow-up with providers on sweat chloride test timing after cystic fibrosis newborn screening identifies a single mutation. J Pediatr 162:522-9
Collins, Jenelle L; La Pean, Alison; O'Tool, Faith et al. (2013) Factors that influence parents' experiences with results disclosure after newborn screening identifies genetic carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Patient Educ Couns 90:378-85
Christopher, Stephanie A; Ahmad, Nadia Y; Bradford, Lisa et al. (2012) A method to assess the organizing behaviors used in physicians' counseling of standardized parents after newborn genetic screening. Commun Med 9:101-11
Christopher, Stephanie A; Collins, Jenelle L; Farrell, Michael H (2012) Effort required to contact primary care providers after newborn screening identifies sickle cell trait. J Natl Med Assoc 104:528-34
Farrell, Michael H; Speiser, Jodi; Deuster, Lindsay et al. (2012) Child health providers' precautionary discussion of emotions during communication about results of newborn genetic screening. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166:62-7
La Pean, Alison; Collins, Jenelle L; Christopher, Stephanie A et al. (2012) A qualitative secondary evaluation of statewide follow-up interviews for abnormal newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Genet Med 14:207-14
Bradford, Lisa; Roedl, Sara J; Christopher, Stephanie A et al. (2012) Use of social support during communication about sickle cell carrier status. Patient Educ Couns 88:203-8
Farrell, Michael H; Christopher, Stephanie A; Tluczek, Audrey et al. (2011) Improving communication between doctors and parents after newborn screening. WMJ 110:221-7

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12 publications