Aggressive behavior is a leading worldwide public health problem costing tens to hundreds of billions of dollars annually in terms of medical care and lost productivity. The human cost is equally great, creating distress and suffering in the aggressor, their victim, loved ones and society as a whole. Despite this there are currently no empirically supported treatments for pathological affective (hostile) aggression. A rich literature suggests that aggression is associated with impaired socio-emotional information processing, which is governed by a prefrontal-limbic circuit in the brain. This is supported by studies of affectively aggressive subjects showing increased amygdala response and decreased orbitomedial prefrontal response to negative socio-emotional stimuli such as angry facial expressions or negative evocative pictures. A goal of cognitive behavioral therapy is to reduce dysfunctional socio- emotional information processing. Preliminary data by the PI suggests a 12- session cognitive behavioral aggression treatment may be efficacious in reducing aggressive behavior and underlying cognitive (socio-emotional information processing) and biological (cortico-limbic activation) deficits associated with affective aggression. To assess the efficacy of this treatment, 120 subjects with clinically relevant affective aggression would be randomized to either the cognitive-behavioral aggression treatment or a supportive psychotherapy control. All subjects will monitor their aggressive behavior throughout the active treatment phase using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Subjects would also complete self-report and behavioral of both aggression and social-emotional information processing and pre-treatment and post-treatment, then again at 6-month and 1-year follow-up. To assess the effect of the cognitive behavioral treatment on cortico-limbic functioning, subjects would complete two social information processing tasks (identifying the emotional valence of faces and evocative pictures) while undergoing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) at pre-treatment and again at post- treatment. It is hypothesized that relative to supportive psychotherapy, the cognitive behavioral aggression treatment will result in decreased aggressive behavior and improved socio- emotional information processing as well as decreased amygdala/increased orbitomedial prefrontal activation to socio-emotional stimuli.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed study is a randomized clinical trial with pre-post neuroimaging to assess putative mechanism of change in a sample of 120 subjects with clinically relevant affective aggression. Subjects will be randomized to either a 12-session cognitive- behavioral aggression treatment or a 12-session supportive psychotherapy control during which time their aggressive behavior will be assessed using standard self-report measures, behavioral aggression measures and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Self-report, behavioral and functional neuroimaging of socio-emotional information processing will occur at pre-treatment and again at post-treatment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01MH086525-01A1
Application #
7793307
Study Section
Interventions Committee for Adult Disorders (ITVA)
Program Officer
Breiling, James P
Project Start
2010-04-15
Project End
2015-01-31
Budget Start
2010-04-15
Budget End
2011-01-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$563,771
Indirect Cost
Name
Temple University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
057123192
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19122
Galbraith, Todd; Carliner, Hannah; Keyes, Katherine M et al. (2018) The co-occurrence and correlates of anxiety disorders among adolescents with intermittent explosive disorder. Aggress Behav 44:581-590
Ammerman, Brooke A; Jacobucci, Ross; McCloskey, Michael S (2018) Using Exploratory Data Mining to Identify Important Correlates of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Frequency. Psychol Violence 8:515-525
Ammerman, Brooke A; Burke, Taylor A; Alloy, Lauren B et al. (2016) Subjective pain during NSSI as an active agent in suicide risk. Psychiatry Res 236:80-85
McCloskey, Michael S; Phan, K Luan; Angstadt, Mike et al. (2016) Amygdala hyperactivation to angry faces in intermittent explosive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 79:34-41
Puhalla, Alexander A; Ammerman, Brooke A; Uyeji, Lauren L et al. (2016) Negative urgency and reward/punishment sensitivity in intermittent explosive disorder. J Affect Disord 201:8-14
Kleiman, Evan M; Ammerman, Brooke A; Kulper, Daniel A et al. (2015) Forms of non-suicidal self-injury as a function of trait aggression. Compr Psychiatry 59:21-7
Kulper, Daniel A; Kleiman, Evan M; McCloskey, Michael S et al. (2015) The experience of aggressive outbursts in Intermittent Explosive Disorder. Psychiatry Res 225:710-5
Look, Amy E; McCloskey, Michael S; Coccaro, Emil F (2015) Verbal versus physical aggression in Intermittent Explosive Disorder. Psychiatry Res 225:531-9
Jenkins, Abigail L; McCloskey, Michael S; Kulper, Daniel et al. (2015) Self-harm behavior among individuals with intermittent explosive disorder and personality disorders. J Psychiatr Res 60:125-31
Fettich, Karla C; McCloskey, Michael S; Look, Amy E et al. (2015) Emotion regulation deficits in intermittent explosive disorder. Aggress Behav 41:25-33

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12 publications