This research has two related goals: To understand the ways in which the brain represents space, and to explain clinical visual/spatial disorders in terms of the underlying spatial representations that have been impaired by brain damage. The first goal involves characterizing both the functional architecture of spatial representation in terms of the spatial frames of reference (i.e. coordinate systems) used to code spatial position, the relation between the internal spatial structure of objects and their location in space, and the modality-specificity of spatial representations. The investigator also will attempt to localize the representations so delineated by examination of lesion site in patients who are and are not impaired in a particular form of spatial representation. The second goal is to determine which clinically observable visual-spatial disorders (including hemispatial neglect, constructional apraxia, visual disorientation, closure deficits, visual agnosia, topographic disorientation, and disorders of personal space) are attributable to impaired spatial representation (as opposed to impairments in memory or executive processes, for example), and to begin to characterize the nature of the impairment of spatial representation where such an impairment is implicated.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
9R01NS034030-05
Application #
2273124
Study Section
Perception and Cognition Review Committee (PEC)
Project Start
1994-09-30
Project End
1997-09-29
Budget Start
1994-09-30
Budget End
1995-09-29
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
1994
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Sitton, M; Mozer, M C; Farah, M J (2000) Superadditive effects of multiple lesions in a connectionist architecture: implications for the neuropsychology of optic aphasia. Psychol Rev 107:709-34
Thompson-Schill, S L; Aguirre, G K; D'Esposito, M et al. (1999) A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia 37:671-6
Farah, M J; Wilson, K D; Drain, M et al. (1998) What is ""special"" about face perception? Psychol Rev 105:482-98
Kurbat, M A; Farah, M J (1998) Is the category-specific deficit for living things spurious? J Cogn Neurosci 10:355-61
Thompson-Schill, S L; Swick, D; Farah, M J et al. (1998) Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:15855-60
Farah, M J (1998) Why does the somatosensory homunculus have hands next to face and feet next to Genitals? A hypothesis. Neural Comput 10:1983-5
Thompson-Schill, S L; D'Esposito, M; Aguirre, G K et al. (1997) Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:14792-7
D'Esposito, M; Detre, J A; Aguirre, G K et al. (1997) A functional MRI study of mental image generation. Neuropsychologia 35:725-30
Tippett, L J; Grossman, M; Farah, M J (1996) The semantic memory impairment of Alzheimer's disease: category-specific? Cortex 32:143-53
Buxbaum, L J; Coslett, H B; Montgomery, M W et al. (1996) Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 34:113-26

Showing the most recent 10 out of 16 publications