Prognostic and predictive molecular markers for breast cancer commonly used in clinical practice include Ki67, ER, PR, Her2, and mitotic index (MI). Of these markers, Ki67 proliferation index (KI), is a universal independent prognostic marker, and MI is an integral element of the current tumor grading system. Unfortunately, these markers have not achieved sufficient reproducibility and reliability to accurately predict disease prognosis and aggressiveness. The limited risk-predictive power of currently-available clinical prognosticators (KI and MI) is the critical barrier preventing accurate patient stratification for optimal therapeutic decision-making. In diagnostic pathology, KI and MI are essentially derived from non-overlapping microscopic fields and are on disparate scales, owing to which they are incomparable and valuable information is lost. Our objective is to bring a tumor's KI and MI on the same measurement scale so as to more accurately harness their true prognostic potential and augment the risk-predictive power of tumor grade. Our central hypothesis predicts that the mitotic frequency within a low-grade tumor drives its ability to acquire highly aggressive and malignant phenotypes. We propose a novel method to rationally integrate KI and MI by defining a combined Mitotic Frequency Risk Index (MFRI) which may serve as a better clinical prognosticator and predictor of metastatic risk associated with a low-grade tumor, than MI. Innovation lies in extracting both KI and MI from the same field by co-staining them immune-fluorescently using anti-Ki67 and anti-phosphohistoneH3 antibody (that stains mitotic cells) to glean an extra layer of relevant information that may enhance the prognostic power of grade. The significance and impact of our approach lies in the broad clinical applicability of MFRI, which would replace MI in the tumor grading system and predict metastatic risk reproducibly and reliably in a variety of tumor types. Our novel paradigm that mitotic frequency among cycling cells (MFRI) is a better prognosticator than MI in low-grade tumors is a groundbreaking concept and holds translational promise in early prediction of tumor behavior.
AIM 1 will involve a retrospective review of 5000 medical records of breast cancer patients to (i) evaluate the variable correlation between KI and MI across different grades of breast tumors, and (ii) establish that replacement of MI by the mean MI/mean KI ratio improves prognostic accuracy of tumor grade.
AIM 2 will determine the Mitotic Frequency Risk Index (MFRI) for a large cohort of Grade 1 (n=200) and Grade 2 (n=200) breast cancer samples and examine its correlation with clinical outcomes. The successful completion of this project may shift current clinical practice paradigms related to risk prognostication by aiding stratification of patients with Grade 1 and 2 tumors into low- and high-risk categories for personalized medicine. It is likely that MFRI, the novel risk index, may also offer insightful cues into why some low-grade, non-invasive breast cancers transform into aggressive tumors that have the ability to metastasize to distant sites.

Public Health Relevance

The limited risk-predictive power of currently-available clinical prognosticators (Ki67 and MI) is the critical barrier preventing accurate patient stratification fo optimal therapeutic decision-making. In diagnostic pathology, KI and MI are essentially derived from non-overlapping microscopic fields and are on disparate scales, owing to which they are incomparable and valuable information is lost. Our objective is to bring a tumor's KI and MI on the same measurement scale so as to more accurately harness their true prognostic potential and augment the risk-predictive power of tumor grade. Innovation lies in extracting both KI and MI from the same field by co-staining them immune-fluorescently using anti-Ki67 and anti-phosphohistoneH3 antibody (that stains mitotic cells) to glean an extra layer of relevant information that may enhance the prognostic power of grade. The successful outcome of our study may yield a new index, Mitotic Frequency Risk Index (MFRI) that could be a game-changer in the domain of prognostic risk determination by identifying individuals at high risk of progressing rapidly to metastatic disease.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Small Research Grants (R03)
Project #
5R03CA188527-02
Application #
9040914
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Program Officer
Filipski, Kelly
Project Start
2015-04-01
Project End
2017-03-31
Budget Start
2016-04-01
Budget End
2017-03-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Georgia State University
Department
Biology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
837322494
City
Atlanta
State
GA
Country
United States
Zip Code
30302
Ogden, Angela; Rida, Padmashree C G; Reid, Michelle D et al. (2015) Die-hard survivors: heterogeneity in apoptotic thresholds may underlie chemoresistance. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 15:277-81
Rida, Padmashree C G; Cantuaria, Guilherme; Reid, Michelle D et al. (2015) How to be good at being bad: centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity drive intratumoral heterogeneity. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34:703-13
Rida, Padmashree C G; LiVecche, Dillon; Ogden, Angela et al. (2015) The Noscapine Chronicle: A Pharmaco-Historic Biography of the Opiate Alkaloid Family and its Clinical Applications. Med Res Rev 35:1072-96
McBride, Michelle; Rida, Padmashree C G; Aneja, Ritu (2015) Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity. Mol Aspects Med 45:3-13
Pannu, Vaishali; Mittal, Karuna; Cantuaria, Guilherme et al. (2015) Rampant centrosome amplification underlies more aggressive disease course of triple negative breast cancers. Oncotarget 6:10487-97