In 1993-1995, we enrolled 364 women with early stage breast cancer into a study, 312 of whom agreed to be randomized to a psychosocial group intervention: education, peer discussion, education + peer discussion, control. The education group had significant benefits to mental and physical functioning, some of which lasted 4 years. No benefits of peer discussion have been documented. In 1998, we began a case-control study of these women as they reached their 5-year survivorship mark. This study is notable for the rigorous control group employed (neighborhood controls) and the wide array of quality of life indices assessed. We found few differences in quality of life between cases and controls, consistent with other recent findings, with the exception of physical functioning. Survivors had worse functioning than controls. We would like to conduct one final in-person interview with these women as they reach their 10-year survivorship mark. Research on survivorship is lacking in general, and there is very little research on 10-year survivors. The goals of the study are: (1) to investigate the positive aspects of the cancer experience with a series of open-ended and close-ended questions on benefit-finding; (2) to describe how survivorship is integrated into women's self-concepts and examine the implications of the survivor self-concept for quality of life; (3) to evaluate changes in quality of life over the 10 years and to discriminate women who are adjusting well in the long-term from those who are having continued difficulties, and (4) to evaluate the research study, including the intervention. We wilt conduct in-person interviews with survivors and significant others to address the issues of benefit-finding and survivor self-concept. We will measure quality of life broadly, identify trajectories of quality of life over the 10 years, and discriminate among the different patterns of change. Finally, we will conduct focus groups with women to examine the positive and negative aspects of their experience with the research study.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
1R21CA104078-01A1
Application #
6819639
Study Section
Behavioral Medicine, Interventions and Outcomes Study Section (BMIO)
Program Officer
Jeffery, Diana D
Project Start
2004-08-01
Project End
2006-07-31
Budget Start
2004-08-01
Budget End
2005-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$131,454
Indirect Cost
Name
Carnegie-Mellon University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
052184116
City
Pittsburgh
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
15213
Helgeson, Vicki S (2011) Survivor centrality among breast cancer survivors: implications for well-being. Psychooncology 20:517-24
Helgeson, Vicki S (2010) Corroboration of Growth Following Breast Cancer: Ten Years Later. J Soc Clin Psychol 29:546-574
Scheier, Michael F; Helgeson, Vicki S; Schulz, Richard et al. (2007) Moderators of interventions designed to enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5710-4
Scheier, Michael F; Helgeson, Vicki S (2006) Really, disease doesn't matter? A commentary on correlates of depressive symptoms in women treated for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2407-8
Helgeson, Vicki S; Reynolds, Kerry A; Tomich, Patricia L (2006) A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:797-816