Reading difficulties have negative consequences that are frequently associated with behavior problems and can adversely impact children's school outcomes, health, and wellbeing. There has been a growing body of work which suggests that the individual traits and history that a child brings into a classroom, and by extension an intervention project, have an interactive effect on literacy learning. Given the call for better understanding and improving the outcomes from literacy intervention paradigms, this project proposes to explore how individual differences in child traits, family environment and familial ris status moderate response to intervention. To do so, this project innovatively proposes to combine three extant intervention projects to create a pooled source of data which is more representative and powerful than any one intervention alone, as well as capitalizing on the knowledge pool of already collected data. The three Aims of this project will serve to meet the general goal of measuring individual differences in response to intervention using the bioecological model.
Aim 1 explores child trait characteristics, or cognitive and psychosocial outcomes.
Aim 2 explores the family environment, such as home literacy practices and parental beliefs.
Aim 3 explores the familial risk status of various learning disabilities and difficulties n response to intervention. By using the novel method of integrative data analysis, the raw data from each project can be combined and heterogeneity across sites controlled for. Additionally, for aspects of child individual differences which are not presently available in the existing intervention projects, we propose to recruit original participants and their families into a questionnaire portion of the present project. This pooling of raw data, as well as the new collection of data through a questionnaire, will allow for the various sources of individual differences, specifically child traits, family environment, and familial risk status, to be enteredas moderators in a multilevel model predicting children's response to intervention defined as post- test status controlled for by pre-test status. This work has the potential to lead to more effectiv literacy interventions, which has great public health implications for school children and future generations of citizens.

Public Health Relevance

Reading problems are associated with school failure and behavior problems that significantly impact children's health. The proposed project will advance understanding of individual differences in response to intervention, particularly increasing knowledge of moderators in learning which will lead to greater literacy gains in future general instruction and intervention research.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
1R21HD072286-01A1
Application #
8511979
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BBBP-L (03))
Program Officer
Miller, Brett
Project Start
2013-04-01
Project End
2015-03-31
Budget Start
2013-04-01
Budget End
2014-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$201,296
Indirect Cost
$67,743
Name
Florida State University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
790877419
City
Tallahassee
State
FL
Country
United States
Zip Code
32306
Daucourt, Mia C; Schatschneider, Christopher; Connor, Carol M et al. (2018) Inhibition, Updating Working Memory, and Shifting Predict Reading Disability Symptoms in a Hybrid Model: Project KIDS. Front Psychol 9:238
Haughbrook, Rasheda; Hart, Sara A; Schatschneider, Christopher et al. (2017) Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy skills across school grade contexts. Dev Sci 20:
Hart, Sara A; Piasta, Shayne B; Justice, Laura M (2016) Do Children's Learning-Related Behaviors Moderate the Impacts of an Empirically-Validated Early Literacy Intervention? Learn Individ Differ 50:73-82
Hart, S A (2016) Precision Education Initiative: Moving Towards Personalized Education. Mind Brain Educ 10:209-211