Revolutionary advances in imaging drive discovery in the biomedical sciences. These advances in imaging depend on innovations in technology throughout the physical and biological sciences. In recent decades, a number of significant breakthroughs have underscored the importance of this interdependent relationship between technology and biomedical science. One important discovery that culminated in the 2008 Nobel Prize was the work of Tsien et al. that led to the structure, expression, and optimization of fluorescent proteins for biomedical imaging applications. There have been other key discoveries in the areas of imaging technology, contrast agents and clinical applications. For example, multimodality imaging, including PET/CT and PET/MR, has evolved at a rapid pace, along with development of image fusion technology for combining data sets from multimodal imaging studies obtained at various biological scales, spatial and temporal resolutions. Major advances in multimodality nanoparticle based imaging agents have taken advantage of the myriad of imaging platforms, from microscopy to MRI and PET. Hyperpolarized 13C MR in concert with simultaneous 11C PET employing state-of-the-art PET/MR scanners promises a revolution in preclinical and clinical molecular imaging. Advances in optical techniques have continued a rapid pace with most recently, super resolution microscopy (Nobel Prize in chemistry, 2014), and optogenetics (Keio Medical Science Prize, 2014) revolutionizing the biological sciences. What are the challenges and frontier domains of imaging sciences in the 21st century? The following examples describe challenges that are interconnected with advances in basic and translational sciences. (1) With progress in cell therapy and tissue engineering, noninvasive imaging of stem cells will be needed to ascertain delivery to target sites. (2) More hybrid imaging systems will be developed, such as PET and optical or photoacoustic imaging. (3) Nanoparticles with multimodality imaging capabilities and drug payloads will be optimized and moved into clinical trials. These challenges must be met by interdisciplinary teams of engineers, physicists, computer scientists, mathematicians, chemists, biologists, and physicians working together at the interfaces between biology, technology, and medicine to develop new imaging technologies, modalities, and applications. Washington University therefore launched the Imaging Sciences Pathway (ISP), initially through a T90-R90 Roadmap Initiative grant through 2010. This proposal requests continued support under a broad-based T32 mechanism for the interdisciplinary training of predoctoral students in our Imaging Sciences Pathway.

Public Health Relevance

Biomedical imaging is key to unlocking the secrets of human health and disease, from the level of genes and proteins, to signaling pathways, to cells and tissues, and whole organisms--and ultimately to visualizing the effectiveness of therapies in action. The better imaging tools we develop, the greater our ability to treat disease and improve human health. To this end, the training of interdisciplinary imaging scientists is critical.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
Type
Institutional National Research Service Award (T32)
Project #
5T32EB014855-09
Application #
10006823
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZEB1)
Program Officer
Erim, Zeynep
Project Start
2012-07-01
Project End
2022-08-31
Budget Start
2020-09-01
Budget End
2021-08-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2020
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Washington University
Department
Radiation-Diagnostic/Oncology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
068552207
City
Saint Louis
State
MO
Country
United States
Zip Code
63130
Donahue, Chad J; Glasser, Matthew F; Preuss, Todd M et al. (2018) Quantitative assessment of prefrontal cortex in humans relative to nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E5183-E5192
Oltean, Alina; Taber, Larry A (2018) Apoptosis generates mechanical forces that close the lens vesicle in the chick embryo. Phys Biol 15:025001
Guertler, Charlotte A; Okamoto, Ruth J; Schmidt, John L et al. (2018) Mechanical properties of porcine brain tissue in vivo and ex vivo estimated by MR elastography. J Biomech 69:10-18
Meinerz, Kelsey; Beeman, Scott C; Duan, Chong et al. (2018) Bayesian Modeling of NMR Data: Quantifying Longitudinal Relaxation in Vivo, and in Vitro with a Tissue-Water-Relaxation Mimic (Crosslinked Bovine Serum Albumin). Appl Magn Reson 49:3-24
Poudel, Joemini; Matthews, Thomas P; Li, Lei et al. (2017) Mitigation of artifacts due to isolated acoustic heterogeneities in photoacoustic computed tomography using a variable data truncation-based reconstruction method. J Biomed Opt 22:41018
Oltean, Alina; Huang, Jie; Beebe, David C et al. (2016) Tissue growth constrained by extracellular matrix drives invagination during optic cup morphogenesis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1405-1421
Bergonzi, Karla M; Bauer, Adam Q; Wright, Patrick W et al. (2015) Mapping functional connectivity using cerebral blood flow in the mouse brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 35:367-70
Sarder, Pinaki; Maji, Dolonchampa; Achilefu, Samuel (2015) Molecular probes for fluorescence lifetime imaging. Bioconjug Chem 26:963-74
Gao, Shengkui; Mondal, Suman B; Zhu, Nan et al. (2015) Image overlay solution based on threshold detection for a compact near infrared fluorescence goggle system. J Biomed Opt 20:016018
Zhou, Yong; Li, Guo; Zhu, Liren et al. (2015) Handheld photoacoustic probe to detect both melanoma depth and volume at high speed in vivo. J Biophotonics 8:961-967

Showing the most recent 10 out of 40 publications