C-Path was created in 2005 under the auspices of the Critical Path Initiative to catalyze advances in medical innovation and regulatory science by leading teams of stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and advocacy organizations and promoting the sharing of data, knowledge and expertise in order to produce sound, consensus-based science. C-Path's successes include the creation of cooperative consortia, the qualification of new drug development tools (DDTs), the endorsement of fit-for-purpose disease progression models and clinical trial simulation tools, the generation of new data standards and databases, and the creation of educational initiatives that advance regulatory science. With renewed funding C-Path will be able to continue developing Critical Path Public-Private Partnerships and advancing innovative, collaborative projects in research, education, and outreach for fostering medical product innovation, enabling the acceleration of medical product development, manufacturing, and translational therapeutics, and enhancing medical product safety.

Public Health Relevance

In March of 2004 FDA launched its Critical Path Initiative to bridge the widening gap between scientific discovery and the availability of innovative medical products to patients. The Critical Path Institute (C-Path) was created in 2005 as a public-private partnership with FDA under the auspices of the Critical Path Initiative with a mission to be a catalyst in the development of new approaches to advance medical innovation and regulatory science. This mission is realized by leading teams of stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and patient and disease advocacy organizations that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus-based science. Developing solutions to unmet needs in regulatory science also requires elements of data science, quantitative analytics, and knowledge of appropriate regulatory contexts. C-Path has established core competencies in these areas that allow it to make meaningful impact on unmet drug development needs. C-Path's core competencies can function independently to further their respective fields (e.g., refine data management practices, develop new analytic and modeling techniques, or train future regulatory scientists) and collaboratively with experts and stakeholders in therapeutic areas to meet specific needs such as qualified biomarkers and clinical outcome assessments. During the previous grant period, C- Path expanded its ability to carry out its mission through the broadening and deployment of its core competencies into specific consortia-related efforts as well as broader, cross-cutting activities. C-Path's successes include the creation of new consortia, qualification of new drug development tools (DDTs), endorsement of fit-for-purpose disease progression models and clinical trial simulation tools, generation of new data standards and databases, and educational initiatives that advance regulatory science. These accomplishments can decrease the time, resources, and number of patients needed to develop and approve medical products and thus de-risk and expedite the medical product development process. Altogether, these efforts support the FDA in its mission to promote public health and ensure the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of medical product development.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Type
Research Demonstration--Cooperative Agreements (U18)
Project #
2U18FD005320-06
Application #
9986368
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZFD1)
Program Officer
Koussis, Patricia
Project Start
2014-09-05
Project End
2024-08-31
Budget Start
2019-09-01
Budget End
2020-08-31
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
2019
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Critical Path Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
175893135
City
Tucson
State
AZ
Country
United States
Zip Code
85718
Taylor, Fiona; Higgins, Sophie; Carson, Robyn T et al. (2018) Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD). Am J Gastroenterol 113:39-48
Byrom, Bill; Watson, Chris; Doll, Helen et al. (2018) Selection of and Evidentiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making: Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium. Value Health 21:631-639
Arneri?, Stephen P; Kern, Volker D; Stephenson, Diane T (2018) Regulatory-accepted drug development tools are needed to accelerate innovative CNS disease treatments. Biochem Pharmacol 151:291-306
Safikhani, Shima; Gries, Katharine S; Trudeau, Jeremiah J et al. (2017) Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:40
Hake, Ann M; Dacks, Penny A; Arneri?, Stephen P et al. (2017) Concise informed consent to increase data and biospecimen access may accelerate innovative Alzheimer's disease treatments. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 3:536-541
Gries, Katharine; Berry, Pamela; Harrington, Magdalena et al. (2017) Literature review to assemble the evidence for response scales used in patient-reported outcome measures. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:41
Neu, Scott C; Pa, Judy; Kukull, Walter et al. (2017) Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Sex Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 74:1178-1189
Eremenco, Sonya; Pease, Sheryl; Mann, Sarah et al. (2017) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium translation process: consensus development of updated best practices. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:12
Naegeli, April N; Hanlon, Jennifer; Gries, Katharine S et al. (2017) Literature review to characterize the empirical basis for response scale selection in pediatric populations. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2:39
Gater, Adam; Nelsen, Linda; Fleming, Sarah et al. (2016) Assessing Asthma Symptoms in Adolescents and Adults: Qualitative Research Supporting Development of the Asthma Daily Symptom Diary. Value Health 19:440-50

Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications