Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in American men yet there are no satisfactory imaging methods for localizing prostate cancer within the gland. An imaging method that successfully localized prostate cancers could be useful for diagnosis, directing therapy and monitoring for recurrence. We have developed a multidisciplinary team of urologists, radiation oncologists, diagnostic radiologists, MR engineers and physicists to develop advanced methods of prostate imaging with MRI at 3Tesla. Patients are scanned with an endorectal coil and high resolution T2 weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI are performed. The results are synthesized to a multiparametric image that is then compared with the biopsy or anatomic specimen. This material, in turn is investigated by the laboratory of Dr. Michael Emmert-Buck to identify potential novel cell surface markers. These markers may be used in the future to develop the next generation of prostate cancer targeted imaging. A unique aspect of this research is that spatial integrity of the cancer with respect to the rest of the gland is maintained so that the cell surface marker data is spatially correlated with MRI. Additionally, we participate in MR guided biopsies of the prostate. In the MIP laboratory we are developing the next generation of molecularly targeted imaging agents based on the findings of Dr. Emmert Buck. Human xenograft tumor models are used to test the efficacy of targed probes (e.g. 111In labeled PSMA antibody, Cy5.5 labeled PSMA aptamer among others).

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Division of Basic Sciences - NCI (NCI)
Type
Intramural Research (Z01)
Project #
1Z01BC010655-01
Application #
7291938
Study Section
(MIP)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Basic Sciences
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Özcan, Alpay; Türkbey, Bar??; Choyke, Peter L et al. (2015) Interactive Feature Space Explorer© for multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 33:804-15
Turkbey, Baris; Mena, Esther; Shih, Joanna et al. (2014) Localized prostate cancer detection with 18F FACBC PET/CT: comparison with MR imaging and histopathologic analysis. Radiology 270:849-56
Padhani, Anwar R; Liu, Guoying; Koh, Dow Mu et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102-25
Hricak, Hedvig; Choyke, Peter L; Eberhardt, Steven C et al. (2007) Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243:28-53
Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste; Grubb 3rd, Robert L; Lee, S Justin et al. (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer. BJU Int 99:1041-6
Susil, Robert C; Menard, Cynthia; Krieger, Axel et al. (2006) Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. J Urol 175:113-20
Choyke, Peter L (2005) Contrast agents for imaging tumor angiogenesis: is bigger better? Radiology 235:1-2
Menard, Cynthia; Susil, Robert C; Choyke, Peter et al. (2004) MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1414-23
Susil, Robert C; Camphausen, Kevin; Choyke, Peter et al. (2004) System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 52:683-7