A major impulse for the study of subjective well-being has been the question how policy affects the distribution of subjective well-being within a country. A natural approach to learning about policy effects is to compare policies across countries and relate these to observed differences in well-being. Most of the work on international comparisons of well-being has been based on global satisfaction measures, like single questions inviting respondents to rate their happiness on a numerical or verbal scale. This work has often produced conflicting findings. More recently, experienced well-being has been proposed as an alternative measure. Both approaches to the measurement of well-being are in principle vulnerable to Differential Item Functioning, particularly when used to compare different countries. We essentially propose providing a laboratory for the development of subjective well-being measures and procedures for making them internationally comparable. This includes a thorough analysis of the properties of the different well-being measures and in particular how anchoring vignettes can be used to improve the comparability of well-being measures across population groups and across countries. To that end we will conduct several experiments in two population representative Internet panels: the American Life Panel (ALP) in the U.S. and the LISS panel in The Netheriands.

Public Health Relevance

There is ample evidence that well-being is related to health outcomes, while subjective well-being is also an important outcome in its own right. A better understanding of how to measure subjective well-being and how alternative measures may lead to different conclusions will aid policy decision making.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01AG008291-19
Application #
8735053
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZAG1-ZIJ-3)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-07-01
Budget End
2015-06-30
Support Year
19
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$143,594
Indirect Cost
$10,332
Name
Rand Corporation
Department
Type
DUNS #
006914071
City
Santa Monica
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90401
Delavande, Adeline; Rohwedder, Susann (2017) Changes in Spending and Labor Supply in Response to a Social Security Benefit Cut: Evidence from Stated Choice Data. J Econ Ageing 10:34-50
Manski, Richard; Moeller, John (2017) Barriers to oral health across selected European countries and the USA. Int Dent J 67:133-138
Manski, Richard; Moeller, John; Chen, Haiyan et al. (2017) Disparity in dental out-of-pocket payments among older adult populations: a comparative analysis across selected European countries and the USA. Int Dent J 67:157-171
Franse, Carmen B; Rietjens, Judith Ac; Burdorf, Alex et al. (2017) A prospective study on the variation in falling and fall risk among community-dwelling older citizens in 12 European countries. BMJ Open 7:e015827
Wind, Barend; Lersch, Philipp; Dewilde, Caroline (2017) The distribution of housing wealth in 16 European countries: accounting for institutional differences. J Hous Built Environ 32:625-647
Pakpahan, Eduwin; Hoffmann, Rasmus; Kröger, Hannes (2017) Retrospective life course data from European countries on how early life experiences determine health in old age and possible mid-life mediators. Data Brief 10:277-282
Delavande, Adeline; Lee, Jinkook; Menon, Seetha (2017) Eliciting Survival Expectations of the Elderly in Low-Income Countries: Evidence From India. Demography 54:673-699
Garcia, Maria Teresa Medeiros; Marques, Pedro Deslandes Correia Vasconcelos (2017) Ownership of individual retirement accounts - an empirical analysis based on SHARE. Int Rev Appl Econ 31:69-82
Gordon, E H; Peel, N M; Samanta, M et al. (2017) Sex differences in frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Gerontol 89:30-40
Bissonnette, Luc; Hurd, Michael D; Michaud, Pierre-Carl (2017) Individual survival curves comparing subjective and observed mortality risks. Health Econ :

Showing the most recent 10 out of 255 publications