This Project focuses on the range of male-female mortality differences. The World Health Organization announced in 2006 that, for humans, female life expectancy exceeded the male level in all the world's countries. It is sometimes thought that this was always the case and that the gap is roughly the same across countries. Furthermore, it is sometimes asserted that female life expectancies exceed male levels for almost all species. The truth is more complicated. The research in this Project relies on lifetables that can be found in the literature and on websites or that we propose to estimate. The lifetables will be analyzed to document the range of male-female mortality differences across human populations over time and place. The Project will also document the range of male-female mortality differences in nonhuman vertebrates by using and analyzing sex-specific mortality data for about 600 species of vertebrates (i.e., mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish). It includes: (1) An analysis of about 3,000 pairs of sex-specific lifetables for human populations over the past 250 years. This will shed new light on the range of differences between male and female life expectancies as well as on male-female age-specific death rates and identify the populations with the biggest and smallest differences. Factors contributing to the gaps will be investigated. (2) A re-assessment of skeletal age-at-death data and an estimation of lifetables for human experience over the past 10,000 years. With this new (re-assessed) data, we will test the hypothesis that from the Neolithic until the late Middle Ages male life expectancy was higher than female life expectancy. Together with the findings from our analyses of human lifetables (see above), these findings will be of importance in providing a better understanding of the development of human male-female longevity differences. (3) A study of sex-specific lifetables and life-expectancies for some 600 vertebrate species. This will reveal the range of the relative life-expectancy gap across species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish and not only show how universal the purported female advantage is, but also shed new light on the species characteristics that determine the size of the gap.

Public Health Relevance

Is it true that males are healthier than females but die younger? If so, why? This research Project addresses these questions concerning the human health-survival paradox. Findings will provide a deeper understanding of the basis for sex differences in health and survival?and of the opportunities that society and particularly health professionals have to improve health and survival for males and females.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01AG031719-05
Application #
8531096
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZAG1-ZIJ-7)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-09-01
Budget End
2014-08-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$74,622
Indirect Cost
$5,321
Name
Duke University
Department
Type
DUNS #
044387793
City
Durham
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27705
Jones, Owen R; Scheuerlein, Alexander; Salguero-Gomez, Roberto et al. (2014) Diversity of ageing across the tree of life. Nature 505:169-73
Oksuzyan, A; Shkolnikova, M; Vaupel, J W et al. (2014) Sex differences in health and mortality in Moscow and Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol 29:243-52
Gesquiere, Laurence R; Ziegler, Toni E; Chen, Patricia A et al. (2014) Measuring fecal testosterone in females and fecal estrogens in males: comparison of RIA and LC/MS/MS methods for wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 204:141-9
Archie, Elizabeth A; Tung, Jenny; Clark, Michael et al. (2014) Social affiliation matters: both same-sex and opposite-sex relationships predict survival in wild female baboons. Proc Biol Sci 281:
Onyango, Patrick O; Gesquiere, Laurence R; Altmann, Jeanne et al. (2013) Puberty and dispersal in a wild primate population. Horm Behav 64:240-9
Alberts, Susan C; Altmann, Jeanne; Brockman, Diane K et al. (2013) Reproductive aging patterns in primates reveal that humans are distinct. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:13440-5
Runcie, Daniel E; Wiedmann, Ralph T; Archie, Elizabeth A et al. (2013) Social environment influences the relationship between genotype and gene expression in wild baboons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20120345
Lindahl-Jacobsen, Rune; Hanson, Heidi A; Oksuzyan, Anna et al. (2013) The male-female health-survival paradox and sex differences in cohort life expectancy in Utah, Denmark, and Sweden 1850-1910. Ann Epidemiol 23:161-6
Babbitt, Courtney C; Tung, Jenny; Wray, Gregory A et al. (2012) Changes in gene expression associated with reproductive maturation in wild female baboons. Genome Biol Evol 4:102-9
Gesquiere, Laurence R; Onyango, Patrick O; Alberts, Susan C et al. (2011) Endocrinology of year-round reproduction in a highly seasonal habitat: environmental variability in testosterone and glucocorticoids in baboon males. Am J Phys Anthropol 144:169-76

Showing the most recent 10 out of 14 publications