The overall scientific goal of this ambitious program project is to develop highly innovative methods for cancer clinical trials that can hasten successful introduction of effective new therapies into practice. The method of approach is to leverage recent advances in statistical and computational science to create new clinical trial designs and data analysis tools that resolve many of the key scientific limitations of current clinical trial methodology. The projects focus on practical design and analysis problems in Phase II and Phase 111 clinical trials, the problem of missing data and efficient use of prognostic information, postmarketing surveillance and comparative effectiveness research using clinical trial data, pharmacogenetics and individualized therapies, and the potential of dynamic treatment regimens to improve cancer treatment. The proposed clinical trial design and analysis innovations have the potential to change the prevailing clinical trial paradigm and greatly increase the rate of discovery and translation of new treatments into clinical practice. Our multi-institutional approach includes an effective and energetic process for intense, coordinated implementation, communication and dissemination of results, including developing new software for practical implementation of the newly developed methods. Our comprehensive and novel approach will lead to significant improvements in cancer clinical trial practice that will result in improved health of cancer patients.
The proposed program project aims to dramatically improve the efficiency of the cancer clinical trial process in order to improve the health and longevity of cancer patients. This is extremely important to public health since almost all biomedical advances in cancer treatment must pass through the clinical trial process before becoming accepted clinical practice.
|Acharya, Chaitanya R; McCarthy, Janice M; Owzar, Kouros et al. (2016) Exploiting expression patterns across multiple tissues to map expression quantitative trait loci. BMC Bioinformatics 17:257|
|Laber, Eric B; Zhao, Ying-Qi; Regh, Todd et al. (2016) Using pilot data to size a two-arm randomized trial to find a nearly optimal personalized treatment strategy. Stat Med 35:1245-56|
|Li, Zhiguo; Owzar, Kouros (2016) Fitting Cox Models with Doubly Censored Data Using Spline-Based Sieve Marginal Likelihood. Scand Stat Theory Appl 43:476-486|
|Wang, Xiaofei; Berry, Mark F (2016) Risk calculators are useful but.... J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:706-7|
|Wang, Xuefeng; Chen, Mengjie; Yu, Xiaoqing et al. (2016) Global copy number profiling of cancer genomes. Bioinformatics 32:926-8|
|Ivanova, Anastasia; Wang, Yunfei; Foster, Matthew C (2016) The rapid enrollment design for Phase I clinical trials. Stat Med 35:2516-24|
|Zhang, Daowen; Sun, Jie Lena; Pieper, Karen (2016) Bivariate Mixed Effects Analysis of Clustered Data with Large Cluster Sizes. Stat Biosci 8:220-233|
|Schifano, Elizabeth D; Wu, Jing; Wang, Chun et al. (2016) Online Updating of Statistical Inference in the Big Data Setting. Technometrics 58:393-403|
|Lizotte, Daniel J; Laber, Eric B (2016) Multi-Objective Markov Decision Processes for Data-Driven Decision Support. J Mach Learn Res 17:|
|Minsker, Stanislav; Zhao, Ying-Qi; Cheng, Guang (2016) Active Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine. J Am Stat Assoc 111:875-887|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 378 publications