Study design is a crucial first step in clinical trials. Well-designed studies are essential for successful cancer research and cancer drug development. Innovative clinical trial designs can potentially require fewer patients, save resources, and accelerate cancer drug development. The broad, long-term objective of this research project is to develop new statistical methodology to address new and challenging issues in the design and analysis of cancer clinical trials. There are 3 specific aims in this praject.
The first aim addresses statistical methods for the design and sample size calculation for longitudinal data and joint models for longitudinal and survival data. Statistical methods will be developed for sample size and power estimation for the overall and direct treatment effect on survival, for the effect of the longitudinal process on survival, and for settings involving multivariate longitudinal and multivariate survival processes.
The second aim studies statistical methodology for the design and analysis of group randomized cancer prevention trials with survival and recurrent event outcomes. Empirical process theory will be used to study the asymptotic behavior of the test statistics and both asymptotic approximation as well as permutation test will be used to develop sample size formulas and power estimation.
The third aim addresses important statistical issues in the oncology drug development pathway. There are three sub-aims. The first sub-aim is in the area of targeted designs. Methods for alternative designs, including """"""""enrichment"""""""" designs, will be developed, and the operating characteristics and costs of these designs to fully targeted designs will be compared. Valid and efficient statistical methods for these trials will be developed by applying a semiparametric empirical likelihood approach. The second sub-aim is in the area of phase 11 designs. New methods for phase II and phase 11/111 clinical trials will be developed and their operating characteristics, costs, and predictive ability for subsequent phase HI trials will be assessed. Information on both combination and non-combination therapies in phase 11 studies and subsequent phase III studies will be gathered to build prediction models using machine learning and other nonparametric classification methods. The third sub-aim is in the area of partially randomized designs. New semiparametric empirical likelihood methods will be developed for the design and analysis of such trials to adjust for selection bias and to improve efficiency. Our research will produce important new and efficient design and analysis tools for cancer research.

Public Health Relevance

This research will provide valuable new design and analysis tools to cancer researchers and other biomedical researchers. These new and improved design and analysis tools will help to improve the quality and efficiency of cancer clinical trials. They will help to improve public health by enabling accurate and efficient estimation of sample size and power calculation for cancer clinical trials and by accelerating cancer drug development.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA142538-04
Application #
8462927
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-RPRB-7)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-04-01
Budget End
2014-03-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$261,022
Indirect Cost
$37,260
Name
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department
Type
DUNS #
608195277
City
Chapel Hill
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27599
Lin, Jiaxing; Gresham, Jeremy; Wang, Tongrong et al. (2018) bcSeq: an R package for fast sequence mapping in high-throughput shRNA and CRISPR screens. Bioinformatics 34:3581-3583
Wu, Jing; de Castro, Mário; Schifano, Elizabeth D et al. (2018) Assessing covariate effects using Jeffreys-type prior in the Cox model in the presence of a monotone partial likelihood. J Stat Theory Pract 12:23-41
Mathur, Ravi; Rotroff, Daniel; Ma, Jun et al. (2018) Gene set analysis methods: a systematic comparison. BioData Min 11:8
Shi, Chengchun; Fan, Alin; Song, Rui et al. (2018) HIGH-DIMENSIONAL A-LEARNING FOR OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES. Ann Stat 46:925-957
Li, Wenqing; Chen, Ming-Hui; Wangy, Xiaojing et al. (2018) Bayesian Design of Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials via the Bayes Factor. Stat Biosci 10:439-459
Wang, Xiaofei; Zhou, Jingzhu; Wang, Ting et al. (2018) On Enrichment Strategies for Biomarker Stratified Clinical Trials. J Biopharm Stat 28:292-308
Psioda, Matthew A; Soukup, Mat; Ibrahim, Joseph G (2018) A practical Bayesian adaptive design incorporating data from historical controls. Stat Med 37:4054-4070
Lawson, Michael T; Cho, Hunyong; Choudhury, Arkopal et al. (2018) Discussion of Laber et al. ""Optimal treatment allocations in space and time for on-line control of an emerging infectious disease"". J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 67:779-780
Zhu, Anqi; Ibrahim, Joseph G; Love, Michael I (2018) Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics :
Liu, Yang; He, Qianchan; Sun, Wei (2018) Association analysis using somatic mutations. PLoS Genet 14:e1007746

Showing the most recent 10 out of 549 publications