Tobacco use is the primary preventable cause of cancer and premature death in the US and most smokers visit a healthcare setting each year, providing an unequaled opportunity to intervene. Yet, most smokers do not receive highly effective smoking treatment during their healthcare visits. To improve the effectiveness of smoking treatment in healthcare, this project will conduct a comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial that compares two promising experimental smoking cessation treatments with one another and with usual care. The two experimental treatments are based on innovative methods: their components have all produced strong additive or interactive effects in prior experiments, they are designed to be part of a chronic care approach that addresses phase-specific challenges of smoking treatment (encountered when preparing to quit, quitting, and maintaining abstinence), and they were engineered for, and tested in, healthcare settings. Smokers (N=1200) from primary care clinics, who want to quit smoking, will be randomized to receive one of three treatments: 1) Abstinence-Optimized Treatment (to maximize cessation success): prequit nicotine gum, 26 weeks of combination nicotine patch + nicotine gum, intensive in-person counseling, and long-term phone counseling; 2) Cost-Optimized Treatment (to maximize abstinence rates for a total cost < $500): 8 weeks of combination nicotine patch + nicotine gum, intensive in-person counseling, and long-term phone counseling; or 3) Usual Care (based on the 2008 Public Health Service Guideline for cessation treatment): 8 weeks of nicotine patch, one in-person and two phone counseling sessions. Treatments will be compared on key clinical (e.g., latency to relapse) and healthcare system (e.g., net monetary benefit) outcomes, and on mechanisms thought to produce their effects. This research will, for the first time, evaluate treatments for smoking that were developed systematically and will determine their comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in real-world settings. Results will be used to construct a chronic care treatment for smoking. The proposed research could shift the paradigm for treating tobacco use to a chronic care model and advance intervention science by validating new treatment development methods.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed research will test promising smoking treatments that contain only components that have been shown to work well together and to be effective in real-world healthcare settings. These treatments could increase smoking cessation in primary care patients and thereby reduce the death and disease caused by tobacco and lead to other improved treatments by validating new treatment development methods.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01CA180945-03
Application #
9130778
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2016-09-01
Budget End
2017-08-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2016
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Wisconsin Madison
Department
Type
DUNS #
161202122
City
Madison
State
WI
Country
United States
Zip Code
53715
Berg, Kristin M; Smith, Stevens S; Piper, Megan E et al. (2018) Identifying Differences in Rates of Invitation to Participate in Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care. WMJ 117:111-115
Schlam, Tanya R; Cook, Jessica W; Baker, Timothy B et al. (2018) Can we increase smokers' adherence to nicotine replacement therapy and does this help them quit? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 235:2065-2075
Nahum-Shani, Inbal; Smith, Shawna N; Spring, Bonnie J et al. (2018) Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med 52:446-462
Nahum-Shani, Inbal; Dziak, John J; Collins, Linda M (2018) Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering. Psychol Methods 23:458-479
Berg, Kristin M; Jorenby, Douglas E; Baker, Timothy B et al. (2018) Triple Smoking Cessation Therapy with Varenicline, Nicotine Patch and Nicotine Lozenge: A Pilot Study to Assess Tolerability, Satisfaction, and End-of-Treatment Quit Rates. J Smok Cessat 13:145-153
Deng, Sien; E McCarthy, Danielle; E Piper, Megan et al. (2018) Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect. Multivariate Behav Res 53:199-218
Hartz, Sarah M; Horton, Amy C; Hancock, Dana B et al. (2018) Genetic correlation between smoking behaviors and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 194:86-90
Piper, Megan E; Cook, Jessica W; Schlam, Tanya R et al. (2018) A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Optimized Smoking Treatment Delivered in Primary Care. Ann Behav Med 52:854-864
Han, Jeong Yeob; Hawkins, Robert; Baker, Timothy et al. (2017) How Cancer Patients Use and Benefit from an Interactive Cancer Communication System. J Health Commun 22:792-799
Baker, Timothy B; Smith, Stevens S; Bolt, Daniel M et al. (2017) Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer. Behav Ther 48:567-580

Showing the most recent 10 out of 70 publications