7.4 PLANNING AND EVALUATION Program planning and evaluation activities are essential to the continued success of the Arizona Cancer Center (AZCC), and is critical in achieving our highest priorities. To that end, the leadership of the Arizona Cancer Center strives to maintain a culture and an environment which promotes the discovery, translation, and delivery of services which is necessary in order to meet our mission. In that endeavor, the continuous planning and evaluation of our activities is necessary. Since we are a matrix center in a highly complex environment, we employ many different mechanisms for receiving advice and contributions from our members to ensure maximum input and communication. The AZCC utilizes six formal mechanisms and one informal mechanism for program planning and evaluation. The formal methods are as follows: a. External Scientific Advisory Board; b. Retreats; c. Individual program meetings; d. Arizona Cancer Center Director's Meeting; e. Arizona Cancer Center Executive Committee (campus-wide advisory board); f. Cancer Center Board (state-wide lay advisory board); The informal method is the intake of day-to-day suggestions by individual AZCC members based on their requirements for conducting basic, translational, or clinical science. Each of these mechanisms and the help they have provided is detailed in the narrative section. An annual budget of $85,000 is requested for the continuation of this effort.
Planning and evaluation activities are critical to the mission of the Center. These activities allow for growth of scientific programs, increased collaborations, planning for new faculty recruits, implementation of new standards, and identification of required resources for new advances in technology and equipment.
|Bea, Jennifer W; Jurutka, Peter W; Hibler, Elizabeth A et al. (2015) Concentrations of the vitamin D metabolite 1,25(OH)2D and odds of metabolic syndrome and its components. Metabolism 64:447-59|
|Leung, Sarah J; Rice, Photini S; Barton, Jennifer K (2015) In vivo molecular mapping of the tumor microenvironment in an azoxymethane-treated mouse model of colon carcinogenesis. Lasers Surg Med 47:40-9|
|Dickinson, Sally E; Rusche, Jadrian J; Bec, Sergiu L et al. (2015) The effect of sulforaphane on histone deacetylase activity in keratinocytes: Differences between in vitro and in vivo analyses. Mol Carcinog 54:1513-20|
|Landowski, Terry H; Gard, Jaime; Pond, Erika et al. (2014) Targeting integrin ?6 stimulates curative-type bone metastasis lesions in a xenograft model. Mol Cancer Ther 13:1558-66|
|Quintero-Ramos, A; Gutiérrez-Rubio, S A; Del Toro-Arreola, A et al. (2014) Association between polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase gene and risk of breast cancer in a Mexican population. Genet Mol Res 13:8749-56|
|Gustafson, Heather L; Yao, Song; Goldman, Bryan H et al. (2014) Genetic polymorphisms in oxidative stress-related genes are associated with outcomes following treatment for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Hematol 89:639-45|
|Jiang, Yanlong; Kong, Qingke; Roland, Kenneth L et al. (2014) Membrane vesicles of Clostridium perfringens type A strains induce innate and adaptive immunity. Int J Med Microbiol 304:431-43|
|Chow, H-H Sherry; Garland, Linda L; Heckman-Stoddard, Brandy M et al. (2014) A pilot clinical study of resveratrol in postmenopausal women with high body mass index: effects on systemic sex steroid hormones. J Transl Med 12:223|
|Kang, Hyun-Jin; Kendrick, Samantha; Hecht, Sidney M et al. (2014) The transcriptional complex between the BCL2 i-motif and hnRNP LL is a molecular switch for control of gene expression that can be modulated by small molecules. J Am Chem Soc 136:4172-85|
|Kurzius-Spencer, Margaret; Burgess, Jefferey L; Harris, Robin B et al. (2014) Contribution of diet to aggregate arsenic exposures-an analysis across populations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 24:156-62|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 852 publications