The first of our four cores is devoted to the overall grant administration. The Administrative Core covers the overall structural organization of the COBRE III. In this section we will present the principles on which the administrative structure was designed, as well as the specific ways in which those principles will be implemented. The COBRE PI/PD has overall responsibility for the grant and is assisted by an Internal Steering Committee and an External Advisory Committee (EAC). The Internal Steering Committee assists with day-today administration of the grant and the EAC provides guidance on larger issues. It also provides expert assistance in scientific review of pilot projects and critiques grant ideas as well as fully developed grant proposals prior to submission. A Program Coordinator, whose main role is to oversee the research instrumentation cores, provides additional management of the COBRE grant. The Administrative Core also oversees faculty meetings (monthly and annually) as well as an annual faculty retreat. The core also addresses issues of faculty mentoring and program evaluation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30GM103333-02
Application #
8518410
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRR1-RI-B)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-05-01
Budget End
2014-04-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$165,880
Indirect Cost
$71,626
Name
University of Delaware
Department
Type
DUNS #
059007500
City
Newark
State
DE
Country
United States
Zip Code
19716
Wang, Bin; Sun, Xuanhao; Akkus, Ozan et al. (2017) Elevated solute transport at sites of diffuse matrix damage in cortical bone: Implications on bone repair. J Orthop Res :
Wellsandt, Elizabeth; Failla, Mathew J; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn (2017) Limb Symmetry Indexes Can Overestimate Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47:334-338
Nawasreh, Zakariya; Logerstedt, David; Cummer, Kathleen et al. (2017) Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery. Br J Sports Med :
Capin, Jacob J; Behrns, William; Thatcher, Karen et al. (2017) On-Ice Return-to-Hockey Progression After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47:324-333
Richardson, R Tyler; Rapp, Elizabeth A; Quinton, R Garry et al. (2017) Errors Associated With Utilizing Prescribed Scapular Kinematics to Estimate Unconstrained, Natural Upper Extremity Motion in Musculoskeletal Modeling. J Appl Biomech 33:469-473
Wellsandt, Elizabeth; Khandha, Ashutosh; Manal, Kurt et al. (2017) Predictors of knee joint loading after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 35:651-656
Khandha, Ashutosh; Manal, Kurt; Wellsandt, Elizabeth et al. (2017) Gait mechanics in those with/without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res 35:625-633
Wellsandt, E; Zeni, J A; Axe, M J et al. (2017) Hip joint biomechanics in those with and without post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 50:63-69
Nawasreh, Zakariya; Logerstedt, David; Cummer, Kathleen et al. (2017) Do Patients Failing Return-to-Activity Criteria at 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Continue Demonstrating Deficits at 2 Years? Am J Sports Med 45:1037-1048
Capin, Jacob J; Khandha, Ashutosh; Zarzycki, Ryan et al. (2017) Gait mechanics and second ACL rupture: Implications for delaying return-to-sport. J Orthop Res 35:1894-1901

Showing the most recent 10 out of 55 publications