Living cells use molecular control circuits to achieve complex behaviors such as homeostasis and adaptation. Typically, such systems are studied on a case-by-case basis, using reverse engineering to dissect the structure of individual regulatory networks. Because of the obscuring effects of evolution, such approaches often fail to reveal the core design principles underlying function. To overcome this problem we propose to apply forward engineering and comparative genomic approaches to understand the design principles of biological circuits. We will focus on understanding adaptation - a property of many sensory systems in which cells respond to an input in a transient manner, but then reset to allow response to further increases in input. We will ask not how any one particular system works, but rather what are the core network structures required to achieve adaptation, and what are the diverse ways in which such structures can be implemented with biological components.
Our specific aims are to: (1) Theoretically define the design rules of adaptation circuits - computationally enumerate and classify all core architecture families that can robustly perform adaptation. (2) Build synthetic adaptation circuits - empirically test and refine our models for circuit structure/function relationships. These will be constructed in yeast using a toolkit of modular molecular parts optimized for engineering of kinase networks. (3) Analyze the variation in natural adaptation circuits across species-- we will focus primarily on the osmostress response in diverse fungal species, but will also quantitatively explore adaptation circuits in other yeast and mammalian stress response pathways.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-CBCB-2)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco
United States
Zip Code
Davis, Zoe H; Verschueren, Erik; Jang, Gwendolyn M et al. (2015) Global mapping of herpesvirus-host protein complexes reveals a transcription strategy for late genes. Mol Cell 57:349-60
Zalatan, Jesse G; Lee, Michael E; Almeida, Ricardo et al. (2015) Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds. Cell 160:339-50
Liang, Samantha I; McFarland, Jesse M; Rabuka, David et al. (2014) A modular approach for assembling aldehyde-tagged proteins on DNA scaffolds. J Am Chem Soc 136:10850-3
Park, Jason S; Rhau, Benjamin; Hermann, Aynur et al. (2014) Synthetic control of mammalian-cell motility by engineering chemotaxis to an orthogonal bioinert chemical signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:5896-901
Braberg, Hannes; Alexander, Richard; Shales, Michael et al. (2014) Quantitative analysis of triple-mutant genetic interactions. Nat Protoc 9:1867-81
Martín, Glòria Mas; King, Devin A; Green, Erin M et al. (2014) Set5 and Set1 cooperate to repress gene expression at telomeres and retrotransposons. Epigenetics 9:513-22
Sivak, David A; Thomson, Matt (2014) Environmental statistics and optimal regulation. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003826
Braberg, Hannes; Moehle, Erica A; Shales, Michael et al. (2014) Genetic interaction analysis of point mutations enables interrogation of gene function at a residue-level resolution: exploring the applications of high-resolution genetic interaction mapping of point mutations. Bioessays 36:706-13
Youk, Hyun; Lim, Wendell A (2014) Secreting and sensing the same molecule allows cells to achieve versatile social behaviors. Science 343:1242782
Keedy, Daniel A; van den Bedem, Henry; Sivak, David A et al. (2014) Crystal cryocooling distorts conformational heterogeneity in a model Michaelis complex of DHFR. Structure 22:899-910

Showing the most recent 10 out of 71 publications