Research Questions and Specific Aims: One important constellation of stakeholders Involved in the conduct of TGR is the triad composed of the researcher/investigator, the research participant, and members of the regulatory community. Large-scale genomic studies using banked population samples are changing the regulatory framework first developed for smaller family genetic studies of rare diseases. New federal regulations requiring the sharing of de-Identified coded genotypic information from these studies is but one challenge to the system, as new guidelines must be developed that balance the needs of research agenda with those of society. The rapid development of new genetic and genomic technologies has also increased the pressure to improve the speed and efficiency of entire research process, particularly when translating research findings into industry or the clinic. Understanding the views of each stakeholder in the biomedical TGR "triad" is paramount in order to harmonize and balance the needs of society with the needs of the research community. The major research agenda for this CGREAL research group focuses on a normative and empiric analysis of the changing regulatory landscape resulting from the advances In large-scale genetic and genomic studies. In particular, the obligation of the public to participate in genetic and genomic research, the evolving beliefs of researchers, regulators and participants about genomic research technologies and the access and use of genomic data that produces unique identifiers (known hereafter as GUIR for Genomic Unique Identifier Research) will be examined by the following specific aims: 1. Determine the knowledge and beliefs of researchers, regulators, and participants about; ? genomic technologies that produce unique identifiers (GUIR) ? the types of information that may be generated or result from GUIR ? how this information could be used in society 2. Determine the beliefs of researchers, regulators, and participants about; ? duties and social obligations to participate in genomic research ? correlating factors that may increase or decrease participation in genomic research ? implications for the design and regulation of genomic research ? potential risks and benefits from participation in genomic research, particularly GUIR 3. Conduct a normative, ethical and regulatory analysis of the social obligations and duties to participate in genomic research. These analyses will explore; ? whether all genomic research creates unique identifiers (GUIR). ? whether the current "social contract" for biomedical research pertains to genomic research and GUIR. ? the implications of the concept of solidarity on the perceived obligation for participation. ? implications of GUIR on regulatory guidelines and policy.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
5P50HG003390-09
Application #
8528670
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHG1-HGR-P)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-08-01
Budget End
2014-07-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$40,895
Indirect Cost
$14,847
Name
Case Western Reserve University
Department
Type
DUNS #
077758407
City
Cleveland
State
OH
Country
United States
Zip Code
44106
Burke, Wylie; Appelbaum, Paul; Dame, Lauren et al. (2015) The translational potential of research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics. Genet Med 17:20-Dec
Goldenberg, Aaron J; Dodson, Daniel S; Davis, Matthew M et al. (2014) Parents' interest in whole-genome sequencing of newborns. Genet Med 16:78-84
Marshall, Patricia A; Adebamowo, Clement A; Adeyemo, Adebowale A et al. (2014) Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria. BMC Med Ethics 15:38
Henderson, Gail E; Wolf, Susan M; Kuczynski, Kristine J et al. (2014) The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 42:344-55
Koay, Pei P; Sharp, Richard R (2014) Managing Expectational Language: Translational genetic professionals consider the clinical potential of next-generation sequencing technologies. New Genet Soc 33:126-148
de Vries, Jantina; Abayomi, Akin; Brandful, James et al. (2014) A perpetual source of DNA or something really different: ethical issues in the creation of cell lines for African genomics research. BMC Med Ethics 15:60
Heidt-Forsythe, Erin; McGowan, Michelle L (2013) Whose right to know? The subjectivity of mothers in mandatory paternity testing. Am J Bioeth 13:42-4
Broder, Sherri M; Ponsaran, Roselle S; Goldenberg, Aaron J (2013) US public cord blood banking practices: recruitment, donation, and the timing of consent. Transfusion 53:679-87
McGowan, Michelle L; Sharp, Richard R (2013) Justice in the context of family balancing. Sci Technol Human Values 38:
Koay, Pei P; Sharp, Richard R (2013) The role of patient advocacy organizations in shaping genomic science. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14:579-95

Showing the most recent 10 out of 36 publications