The computational modeling core is designed to support the development of biologically plausible computational models across the range of projects proposed in the center. Various existing models have been developed for the experimental tasks employed across all of the proposed projects. This includes models of cognitive control (Project 1), learning (Project 2), emotion (Project 3), dompainergic infulences on executive funciton (Project 4) and child development (Project 5). Because these models are biologically inspired they consider both neurobiological and psychological constraints on processing. The development of computational models provides an important way of synthesizing experimental results in a mechanistic fashion, and generating predictions for further experimental studies. These models will be used in parallel with empirical investigations so that they can inform each other. Because of these characteristics, the computational core explicitly addresses a center goal of linking levels of analysis (computational, psychological, and neurobiological) in our understanding of executive function. The personnel associated with the computational core will provide both the faculty and post-doctoral expertise with regards to the creation, implementation and evaulation of comptuational models for all projects within the center. In addition, it will provide the computational infrastructure for those investigations as well as training materials and training opportunity for center members. Computational models of executive function can provide insights into psychiatric disorders in numerous ways. For example, models can be """"""""lesioned"""""""" or altered in ways that are impossible to do experimentally for either ethical or practical reasons. As such, they can provide insights into the mechanisms that support disordered thoughts or emotional processes. Furthermore, they may provide insights into mechanisms or interventions that might be effective in overcoming such disorders. This is especially true of the models proposed for this center, which are explicitly linked to the neuroanatomy and functioning of brain systems as well as the psychological processes that support executive function.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
5P50MH079485-05
Application #
8378649
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1-ERB-H)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2012-02-01
Budget End
2013-01-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$211,569
Indirect Cost
$72,597
Name
University of Colorado at Boulder
Department
Type
DUNS #
007431505
City
Boulder
State
CO
Country
United States
Zip Code
80309
Vargas, Teresa; Snyder, Hannah; Banich, Marie et al. (2018) Altered selection during language processing in individuals at high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res 202:303-309
Popov, Tzvetan; Westner, Britta U; Silton, Rebecca L et al. (2018) Time Course of Brain Network Reconfiguration Supporting Inhibitory Control. J Neurosci 38:4348-4356
Szekely, Akos; Silton, Rebecca L; Heller, Wendy et al. (2017) Differential functional connectivity of rostral anterior cingulate cortex during emotional interference. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12:476-486
Medrano, Paolo; Nyhus, Erika; Smolen, Andrew et al. (2017) Individual differences in EEG correlates of recognition memory due to DAT polymorphisms. Brain Behav 7:e00870
Benca, Chelsie E; Derringer, Jaime L; Corley, Robin P et al. (2017) Predicting Cognitive Executive Functioning with Polygenic Risk Scores for Psychiatric Disorders. Behav Genet 47:11-24
Burdwood, Erin N; Infantolino, Zachary P; Crocker, Laura D et al. (2016) Resting-state functional connectivity differentiates anxious apprehension and anxious arousal. Psychophysiology 53:1451-9
Pauli, Wolfgang M; O'Reilly, Randall C; Yarkoni, Tal et al. (2016) Regional specialization within the human striatum for diverse psychological functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:1907-12
Reineberg, Andrew E; Banich, Marie T (2016) Functional connectivity at rest is sensitive to individual differences in executive function: A network analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2959-75
Bredemeier, Keith; Warren, Stacie L; Berenbaum, Howard et al. (2016) Executive function deficits associated with current and past major depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 204:226-33
Depue, B E; Orr, J M; Smolker, H R et al. (2016) The Organization of Right Prefrontal Networks Reveals Common Mechanisms of Inhibitory Regulation Across Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Processes. Cereb Cortex 26:1634-1646

Showing the most recent 10 out of 92 publications