This longitudinal study will identify specific pathways that are responsible for the link between personality and health in later life. It will employ enhanced assessment methods, including informant reports, interviews, and self-report measures of adaptive as well as maladaptive variants of personality traits. We will investigate psychosocial factors, biological pathways, and personality changes in relation to subjective health, diagnosis and treatment for specific medical disorders, and mortality. Personality traits will be considered both in terms of their protective (e.g., conscientiousness and health behaviors) and harmful functions (e.g., neuroticism and stressful life events). At the psychosocial level of analysis, three mechanisms will be examined as important mediators and moderators: health behaviors (e.g., use of tobacco and alcohol);exposure to environmental adversity (e.g., trauma, neglect, and on-going stressful life events);and social integration (e.g. intimate relationships, social networks, and community involvement). At the biological level of analysis, three additional mechanisms will be considered: neuroendocrine functioning (cortisol);immune system functioning (inflammation);and chromosomal stability (telomere length). Pathways between personality and health will be considered in terms of stable trait levels as well as personality change. Our data will allow us to examine health disparities, testing a variety of hypotheses concerned with both risk and resilience. For example, we will study the role that personality characteristics (e.g., mistrust and impulsivity) play in moderating the relation between environmental adversity and chronic illness. The study will extend data collection with a sample of participants that has already been studied for six years, beginning in 2007. The participants form a representative, ethnically diverse (33 percent African-American), community-based sample of 1,630 persons between the ages of 55 and 64 (when entering the study) ---those approaching the challenges of later life. All participants completed comprehensive assessments of personality, health, and social adjustment at baseline. Stressful life events, social adjustment, and changes in health were then monitored at regular six-month follow-up assessments, leading up to a second assessment of personality, which was conducted 2.5 years after baseline. During Phase II (the next project period), we will conduct two more personality assessments: the third will occur three years after the second, and the fourth will occur two years after the third. We will also collect blood samples to be used for measuring biomarkers at the time personality assessments three and four. Regular follow-up assessments of health, health behaviors, stressful life events, and social functioning will continue to be completed at four regular 6-month intervals following the third assessment. This project fills an important gap in knowledge regarding mechanisms that explain the connection between personality and health.

Public Health Relevance

Personality traits are among the best psychological predictors of health status and longevity, but few studies test the specific mechanisms that are responsible for this association. Furthermore, few studies assess personality at multiple time points to investigate how changes in personality are associated with the health process. This project adopts an integrative approach that will examine simultaneously psychosocial factors (i.e., stress, social integration, health behaviors) and biological factors (i.e., cortisol, inflammation, telomere length) that contribute to the development of chronic diseases.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Social Psychology, Personality and Interpersonal Processes Study Section (SPIP)
Program Officer
Nielsen, Lisbeth
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Washington University
Schools of Arts and Sciences
Saint Louis
United States
Zip Code
Corral-Frías, N S; Pizzagalli, D A; Carré, J M et al. (2016) COMT Val(158) Met genotype is associated with reward learning: a replication study and meta-analysis. Genes Brain Behav 15:503-13
Waller, Rebecca; Corral-Frías, Nadia S; Vannucci, Bianca et al. (2016) An oxytocin receptor polymorphism predicts amygdala reactivity and antisocial behavior in men. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 11:1218-26
Eisenstein, Sarah A; Bogdan, Ryan; Love-Gregory, Latisha et al. (2016) Prediction of striatal D2 receptor binding by DRD2/ANKK1 TaqIA allele status. Synapse 70:418-31
Busch, Alexander J; Balsis, Steve; Morey, Leslie C et al. (2016) Gender Differences in Borderline Personality Disorder Features in an Epidemiological Sample of Adults Age 55-64: Self Versus Informant Report. J Pers Disord 30:419-32
Bogdan, Ryan; Pagliaccio, David; Baranger, David Aa et al. (2016) Genetic Moderation of Stress Effects on Corticolimbic Circuitry. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:275-96
Nelson, E C; Agrawal, A; Heath, A C et al. (2016) Evidence of CNIH3 involvement in opioid dependence. Mol Psychiatry 21:608-14
Iacovino, Juliette M; Bogdan, Ryan; Oltmanns, Thomas F (2016) Personality Predicts Health Declines Through Stressful Life Events During Late Mid-Life. J Pers 84:536-46
Bogdan, Ryan; Winstone, Jonathan Ma; Agrawal, Arpana (2016) Genetic and Environmental Factors Associated with Cannabis Involvement. Curr Addict Rep 3:199-213
Carlson, Erika N; Oltmanns, Thomas F (2015) The Role of Metaperception in Personality Disorders: Do People with Personality Problems Know How Others Experience Their Personality? J Pers Disord 29:449-67
Carey, Caitlin E; Agrawal, Arpana; Zhang, Bo et al. (2015) Monoacylglycerol lipase (MGLL) polymorphism rs604300 interacts with childhood adversity to predict cannabis dependence symptoms and amygdala habituation: Evidence from an endocannabinoid system-level analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 124:860-77

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications