Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) decreases colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality, yet remains underutilized. Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up (SOS) is a 2-year randomized controlled trial designed to increase: (1) CRC screening and (2) follow-up of positive screening tests. The Chronic Care Model and the Preventive Health Model inform study design. For this Competitive Revision we propose two new ancillary aims to address the following questions: 1) Does the medical home model modify (i.e. enhance or reduce) the effectiveness of the SOS intervention? Primary Aim #1: To compare SOS systems-level intervention effect in clinics before and after MH implementation. We hypothesize that SOS systems-level CRCS rates will continue be higher than UC (MH alone) in year 2, but CRCS rates will be modified (lessoned or enhanced) by characteristics of clinics and their implementation of MH components. To test this hypothesis we will collect data on covariates related to process measures related to implementation of the MH and clinic characteristics. 7 Primary outcomes will include to what degree CRCS and FOBT rates are modified by MH implementation and clinic factors. 2) Is a continued systems-level intervention required to maintain increases in CRCS for those choosing annual FOBT? Primary Aim #2: To determine the durability and long-term impact of SOS systems-level automated interventions over time. We hypothesize that continued SOS automated interventions are needed for patients to remain current for FOBT screening over time. We also hypothesize that individuals who have previously completed in years 1-2, will still be more likely to complete CRCS, than those not receiving SOS automated interventions. To test these hypotheses we propose in year 3 to randomize patients in the active intervention groups (auto, assist, and care managed) who are still eligible for CRCS (have not had a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy) to either: A. Stopped Auto or B. Continued Auto systems-level FOBT interventions 7 Primary outcomes include CRCS and FOBT rates, categorically (yes/no) in year 3 and as person-time assessments of appropriate CRCS and FOBT coverage in years 1-3 This study will efficiently address these questions by taking advantage of an existing study cohort.

Public Health Relevance

Screening people age 50 to 75 prevents colon cancer from starting and dying from it, but almost half have not been screened. This study is testing how much help patients need to get colon cancer screening done. In the second year of the study, the health plan made changes to how clinics deliver health care. This change is called the """"""""Medical Home"""""""" and doctors are given more time to see patients and medical assistants check to see if patients are due for screening tests, such as colon cancer screening, and help at visits or mail letters. We will study whether """"""""Medical Home"""""""" care increases colon cancer screening.
A second aim of this study will to be to find out if people who choose to do stool cards at home, need to receive these in the mail every year to stay current for screening.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
3R01CA121125-05S1
Application #
8105785
Study Section
Health Services Organization and Delivery Study Section (HSOD)
Program Officer
Klabunde, Carrie N
Project Start
2006-04-01
Project End
2013-08-31
Budget Start
2011-07-01
Budget End
2013-08-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$259,253
Indirect Cost
Name
Group Health Cooperative
Department
Type
DUNS #
078198520
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98101
Green, Beverly B; Anderson, Melissa L; Cook, Andrea J et al. (2017) A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer 123:4472-4480
Green, Beverly B; Fuller, Sharon; Anderson, Melissa L et al. (2017) A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening: Collaboration between a Primary Care Clinic and Research Team. J Fam Med 4:
Green, Beverly B; BlueSpruce, June; Tuzzio, Leah et al. (2017) Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. BMC Public Health 17:531
Green, Beverly B; Anderson, Melissa L; Chubak, Jessica et al. (2016) Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH). J Am Board Fam Med 29:191-200
Green, Beverly B; Anderson, Melissa L; Chubak, Jessica et al. (2016) Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial. Cancer 122:312-21
Meenan, Richard T; Anderson, Melissa L; Chubak, Jessica et al. (2015) An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice. Am J Prev Med 48:714-21
Green, Beverly B; Anderson, Melissa L; Wang, Ching-Yun et al. (2014) Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med 27:789-95
Green, Beverly B; Coronado, Gloria D (2014) ""BeneFITs"" to increase colorectal cancer screening in priority populations. JAMA Intern Med 174:1242-3
Laing, Sharon S; Bogart, Andy; Chubak, Jessica et al. (2014) Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:154-9
Wang, Ching-Yun; de Dieu Tapsoba, Jean; Anderson, Melissa L et al. (2014) Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:1683-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications