Quantitative dual-energy CT imaging for radiation therapy treatment planning 6. Project Summary/Abstract Proton-beam therapy (PT) and low-energy (20-60 keV) photon-emitting brachytherapy (LEPBT) are rapidly evolving modalities with high potential for improving radiation therapy clinical outcomes because of their ability to deliver high doses to the target tissue while sparing surrounding normal tissues. Dose delivery from both modalities is sensitive to the atomic composition as well as election density of the irradiated tissues. For LEPBT, current dose-calculation practice ignores tissue inhomogeneity, introducing dose-prediction errors as large as a factor of 2. For PT, current quantitative single-energy computed tomography imaging (QSECT) leads to 3-6 mm range uncertainties that significantly increases exposure of adjacent organs to high doses. Recommended bulk tissue compositions are based upon inadequate data with large and essentially unknown patient-to-patient and intrapatient variability and cannot provide an adequate basis either for clinical treatment planning or assessing dose delivery uncertainty in PT or LEPBT. Conventional QSECT is inadequate for quantitative study of PT and LEPBT radiological tissue properties because tissue composition and electron density vary independently. The goal of this project is to develop and validate a novel quantitative dual-energy CT (QDECT) imaging technology able to accurately image the radiological properties and to demonstrate QDECT utility by assessing the magnitude and clinical significance of tissue inhomogeneities in a small patient sample. To achieve these goals, three specific aims are proposed.
In Specific Aim 1, a novel statistical image reconstruction algorithm will be developed for reconstructing 3D cross-section maps derived from dual energy spiral sinograms exported from a clinical multi-slice CT imaging system. Specifically, an alternating minimization regularized, 3D reconstruction engine will be adapted and optimized to the problems of accurate tissue-map imaging for brachytherapy and proton-beam dose planning and a clinical prototype implemented.
In Specific Aim 2, QDECT cross-section images reconstructed from experimentally-acquired dual-energy sinograms will be validated against experimental phantom, patient data, and computational benchmarks. Analysis of estimation errors will be used to focus AM reconstruction algorithm optimization efforts above. The developed QDECT process will be used to study the magnitude and variability of proton stopping-power and photon-cross section maps in our small patient population.
Specific Aim 3 will study the dosimetric and clinical impact of more accurate patient-specific QDECT cross-section distributions on simulated brachytherapy, electron-beam and proton-beam treatment plans in head and neck, prostate, breast, and lung cancer sites using available treatment-planning systems and Monte Carlo dose-estimation codes.

Public Health Relevance

The therapeutic advantage of exit-dose free proton-therapy over competing modalities such as megavoltage photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is partially negated because of the large target volume margins needed to compensate for 3-6 mm range uncertainties. By reducing such range uncertainties to 1 mm, our quantitative cross-section imaging project will make proton-therapy high dose critical structure sparing competitive with IMRT, greatly enhancing its potential for improving clinical outcomes. For low-energy photon brachytherapy (LEPBT) of localized prostate cancer and accelerated partial breast irradiation, our project will reduce 10%-30% dose uncertainties to 5%, enabling dose escalation in higher risk disease without increasing toxicity and objective comparison with other radiation therapy modalities to be realized.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Radiation Therapeutics and Biology Study Section (RTB)
Program Officer
Deye, James
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Virginia Commonwealth University
Schools of Medicine
United States
Zip Code
Chen, Yaqi; O'Sullivan, Joseph A; Politte, David G et al. (2016) Line Integral Alternating Minimization Algorithm for Dual-Energy X-Ray CT Image Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:685-98
Han, Dong; Siebers, Jeffrey V; Williamson, Jeffrey F (2016) A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation. Med Phys 43:600
Whiting, Bruce R; Dohatcu, Andreea C; Evans, Joshua D et al. (2015) Technical Note: Measurement of bow tie profiles in CT scanners using radiochromic film. Med Phys 42:2908-14
Whiting, Bruce R; Evans, Joshua D; Dohatcu, Andreea C et al. (2014) Measurement of bow tie profiles in CT scanners using a real-time dosimeter. Med Phys 41:101915
Evans, Joshua D; Whiting, Bruce R; Politte, David G et al. (2013) Experimental implementation of a polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithm for a commercial fan-beam CT scanner. Phys Med 29:500-12
Evans, Joshua D; Whiting, Bruce R; O'Sullivan, Joseph A et al. (2013) Prospects for in vivo estimation of photon linear attenuation coefficients using postprocessing dual-energy CT imaging on a commercial scanner: comparison of analytic and polyenergetic statistical reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys 40:121914
Mukhopadhyay, Nitai D; Sampson, Andrew J; Deniz, Daniel et al. (2012) Estimating statistical uncertainty of Monte Carlo efficiency-gain in the context of a correlated sampling Monte Carlo code for brachytherapy treatment planning with non-normal dose distribution. Appl Radiat Isot 70:315-23
Sampson, Andrew; Le, Yi; Williamson, Jeffrey F (2012) Fast patient-specific Monte Carlo brachytherapy dose calculations via the correlated sampling variance reduction technique. Med Phys 39:1058-68
Evans, Joshua D; Politte, David G; Whiting, Bruce R et al. (2011) Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms. Med Phys 38:1444-58