The purpose of this competing continuation grant proposal is to continue developing, evaluating and applying methodological and statistical procedures to determine how prevention programs change outcome variables. These mediation analyses assess the link between program effects on the constructs targeted by a prevention program and effects on the outcome. As noted by many researchers, mediation analyses identify the most effective program components and increase understanding of the underlying processes leading to changing outcome variables. The P. I. of this grant received a one-year NIDA small grant and two four-year grants to develop and evaluate mediation analysis methods and statistical procedures for the designs and procedures commonly used in prevention research. The proposed five-year continuation study focuses on practical needs of researchers, applying recent statistical developments to mediation analysis, and developing methods for new prevention research designs. Four statistical topics represent the next steps in this research and will include analytical and simulation research as well as applications to actual etiological and prevention data. In Study 1, practical issues in significance testing are investigated including the best methods for studies with limited sample size and general methods to assess required sample size for any mediation design. Study 2 develops methods to assess how violations of assumptions of the mediation model lead to incorrect conclusions. Study 2 extends new developments in causal inference to mediation analysis to investigate and test assumptions of mediation analysis. Study 3 develops and evaluates longitudinal mediation methods beyond the latent growth curve modeling investigated in prior funding. Conceptual and statistical alternatives for mediation analysis of data from two waves and three or more waves will be thoroughly investigated. New alternative longitudinal mediation models based on autoregressive, latent difference, and exponential decay differential equation models will be developed and compared. Study 4 evaluates a general model developed in our prior research to investigate mediation when there are also moderator effects or program effects that differ by subgroups of participants. Moderator effects are common in prevention research. This study will also incorporate longitudinal relations in the general mediation and moderation model as well as investigate the types of effects common in prevention science. Study 5 applies the statistical methods to data from several NIH funded prevention data sets providing important feedback about the usefulness of the models. Study 6 disseminates new information about mediation analysis through our website, by communication with researchers, and publications from the project.
The project investigates a statistical method, mediation analysis that extracts more information from research. Mediation analysis provides information on how and why prevention and treatments are successful. Mediation analysis can improve prevention and treatment so that they have greater effects and even cost less.
|Fritz, Matthew S; Kenny, David A; MacKinnon, David P (2016) The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model. Multivariate Behav Res 51:681-697|
|Valente, Matthew J; Gonzalez, Oscar; MioÄeviÄ‡, Milica et al. (2016) A Note on Testing Mediated Effects in Structural Equation Models: Reconciling Past and Current Research on the Performance of the Test of Joint Significance. Educ Psychol Meas 76:889-911|
|Pirlott, Angela G; MacKinnon, David P (2016) Design approaches to experimental mediation. J Exp Soc Psychol 66:29-38|
|Fairchild, Amanda J; Abara, Winston E; Gottschall, Amanda C et al. (2015) Improving Our Ability to Evaluate Underlying Mechanisms of Behavioral Onset and Other Event Occurrence Outcomes: A Discrete-Time Survival Mediation Model. Eval Health Prof 38:315-42|
|MacKinnon, David P; Pirlott, Angela G (2015) Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 19:30-43|
|O'Rourke, Holly P; MacKinnon, David P (2015) When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect. Behav Res Methods 47:424-42|
|Fritz, Matthew S; Cox, Matthew G; MacKinnon, David P (2015) Increasing Statistical Power in Mediation Models Without Increasing Sample Size. Eval Health Prof 38:343-66|
|Pugliese, Cara E; Fritz, Matthew S; White, Susan W (2015) The role of anger rumination and autism spectrum disorder-linked perseveration in the experience of aggression in the general population. Autism 19:704-12|
|Wurpts, Ingrid C (2015) Performance of Contextual Multilevel Models for Comparing Between-Person and Within-Person Effects. Multivariate Behav Res 50:721|
|Kisbu-Sakarya, Yasemin; MacKinnon, David P; MioÄeviÄ‡, Milica (2014) The Distribution of the Product Explains Normal Theory Mediation Confidence Interval Estimation. Multivariate Behav Res 49:261-268|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 69 publications