In November 2000, California voters approved the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (Proposition 36), which mandates diversion of drug-abusing offenders to community-based treatment programs in lieu of incarceration. Building on current research efforts at the state, county, and treatment provider levels, the applicants propose to conduct two separate but interrelated studies to examine the treatment system impact and outcomes of Proposition 36 in five selected counties. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, the System Impact Study will explore the effects of the implementation of Proposition 36 on California's treatment service delivery system (counties and providers), the system's response, and the relationships between the treatment system and the criminal justice system. The Treatment Outcome Study will assess treatment outcomes among Proposition 36 patients as influenced by program/service characteristics and by patient characteristics within the broad environmental context of the five counties' service delivery systems. Findings from the proposed work will elucidate the effects of implementing this new drug policy on the treatment service delivery system and will identify factors that influence the treatment outcomes among California's large drug-abusing offender population. The project will produce recommendations to improve treatment strategies and inform future policy and practice at the national, state, and local levels.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DA015431-05
Application #
7069129
Study Section
Human Development Research Subcommittee (NIDA)
Program Officer
Hilton, Thomas
Project Start
2002-07-20
Project End
2008-06-30
Budget Start
2006-07-01
Budget End
2008-06-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$437,926
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California Los Angeles
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
092530369
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90095
Du, Jiang; Huang, David; Zhao, Min et al. (2013) Drug-abusing offenders with co-morbid mental disorders: gender differences in problem severity, treatment participation, and recidivism. Biomed Environ Sci 26:32-9
Jaffe, Adi; Du, Jiang; Huang, David et al. (2012) Drug-abusing offenders with comorbid mental disorders: problem severity, treatment participation, and recidivism. J Subst Abuse Treat 43:244-50
Wu, Fei; Hser, Yih-Ing (2011) Workforce professionalism in drug treatment services: impact of California's Proposition 36. J Subst Abuse Treat 40:44-55
Evans, Elizabeth; Huang, David; Hser, Yih-Ing (2011) High-risk offenders participating in court-supervised substance abuse treatment: characteristics, treatment received, and factors associated with recidivism. J Behav Health Serv Res 38:510-25
Evans, Elizabeth; Hser, Yih-Ing; Huang, David (2010) Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's proposition 36 drug treatment initiative. J Behav Health Serv Res 37:461-76
Niv, Noosha; Hamilton, Alison; Hser, Yih-Ing (2009) Impact of court-mandated substance abuse treatment on clinical decision making. J Behav Health Serv Res 36:505-16
Evans, Elizabeth; Li, Libo; Hser, Yih-Ing (2009) Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Eval Program Plann 32:204-12
Niv, Noosha; Pham, Rhoda; Hser, Yih-Ing (2009) Racial and ethnic differences in substance abuse service needs, utilization, and outcomes in California. Psychiatr Serv 60:1350-6
Evans, Elizabeth; Li, Libo; Hser, Yih-Ing (2008) Treatment entry barriers among California's Proposition 36 offenders. J Subst Abuse Treat 35:410-8
Hser, Yih-Ing; Teruya, Cheryl; Brown, Alison H et al. (2007) Impact of California's Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: treatment capacity and displacement. Am J Public Health 97:104-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications