Injection drug users (IDUs) constitute 60% of the approximately 5 million people in the U.S. infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Up to 90% of HIV-infected IDUs are also infected with HCV. HCV treatment leading to sustained viral response (SVR) is associated with increased survival, but to date IDUs have had poor access to HCV care and their success in HCV treatment has been limited. Although past HCV therapies have been relatively ineffective in genotype-1 infected patients, newer regimens are substantially improved. With direct-acting antiviral agents, HCV treatment delivered within large clinical trials leads to SVR or cure in over 70% of genotype-1 infected patients (including HIV/HCV-coinfected patients), compared to 45% with previous therapies. However, SVR rates are as low as 14% in real-world settings. The majority of patients who fail to achieve SVR will develop drug resistance, but the optimal adherence level to minimize resistance is unknown. If HCV treatment continues to be delivered within current models of care, most IDUs will not only fail treatment and develop resistance, but may transmit resistant viruses to others. Because the life- and costsaving benefits of new HCV treatments will not be realized unless we determine optimal models of care for the majority of HCV-infected patients, we are proposing a randomized controlled trial of three models of care. We have previously developed a multidisciplinary model of HCV care which integrates on-site primary care (including HIV care), substance abuse treatment, psychiatric care, and HCV-related care within opiate agonist treatment clinics. To maximize treatment outcomes, we piloted two models of intensive HCV-related care: directly observed therapy (DOT), and concurrent group therapy (CGT). In our DOT model, pegylated interferon is administered once weekly, and one daily dose of oral medication is administered at the methadone window. In our CGT model, patients initiate HCV treatment within a once weekly treatment group which provides powerful social support to mitigate fears of side effects, promote efficient education, and deliver weekly injections. It is unknown whether either model is better or more cost-effective than standard on-site care. In the proposed study, 150 IDUs (100 HCV-monoinfected and 50 HIV/HCV coinfected) with chronic HCV (genotype 1) will be recruited from methadone clinics and randomized to one of three models of care: DOT;concurrent group treatment;or standard on-site care.
Our specific aims are: 1) To determine whether either of two intensive on-site HCV treatment models (DOT or concurrent group treatment) is more efficacious than standard on-site treatment for enhancing adherence and SVR, and decreasing drug resistance;(2) To determine the incidence and factors associated with the development of drug resistance in IDUs;(3) To perform cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of each model;and (4) To examine the impact of HIV coinfection on adherence and virologic outcomes among HCV-infected IDUs.
Injection drug users (including up to 90% of HIV-infected injection drug users) comprise nearly two-thirds of the 5 million people living with HCV-infection in the United States. Though direct acting antiviral agents targeting HCV have tremendous potential to end the HCV epidemic, few injection drug users ever initiate HCV treatment. To realize the full potential of new HCV therapies, it is essential to investigate care delivery models to improve adherence and maximize the number of injection drug users that are able to be cured.
|Heo, Moonseong; Litwin, Alain H; Blackstock, Oni et al. (2017) Sample size determinations for group-based randomized clinical trials with different levels of data hierarchy between experimental and control arms. Stat Methods Med Res 26:399-413|
|Batchelder, A W; Cockerham-Colas, L; Peyser, D et al. (2017) Perceived benefits of the hepatitis C peer educators: a qualitative investigation. Harm Reduct J 14:67|
|Norton, Brianna L; Southern, William N; Steinman, Meredith et al. (2016) No Differences in Achieving Hepatitis C Virus Care Milestones Between Patients Identified by Birth Cohort or Risk-Based Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:1356-60|
|Batchelder, A W; Peyser, D; Nahvi, S et al. (2015) ""Hepatitis C treatment turned me around:"" Psychological and behavioral transformation related to hepatitis C treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 153:66-71|
|Litwin, Alain H; Soloway, Irene J; Cockerham-Colas, Lauren et al. (2015) Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C with triple therapy in an opioid agonist treatment program. Int J Drug Policy 26:1014-9|
|Safo, Stella A; Batchelder, Abigail; Peyser, Deena et al. (2015) The common sense model applied to hepatitis C: a qualitative analysis of the impact of disease comparison and witnessed death on hepatitis C illness perception. Harm Reduct J 12:20|
|Roose, Robert J; Cockerham-Colas, Lauren; Soloway, Irene et al. (2014) Reducing barriers to hepatitis C treatment among drug users: an integrated hepatitis C peer education and support program. J Health Care Poor Underserved 25:652-62|
|Edlin, Brian R; Winkelstein, Emily R (2014) Can hepatitis C be eradicated in the United States? Antiviral Res 110:79-93|
|Bruggmann, Philip; Litwin, Alain H (2013) Models of care for the management of hepatitis C virus among people who inject drugs: one size does not fit all. Clin Infect Dis 57 Suppl 2:S56-61|
|Stein, Melissa R; Soloway, Irene J; Jefferson, Karen S et al. (2012) Concurrent group treatment for hepatitis C: implementation and outcomes in a methadone maintenance treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat 43:424-32|