A frequent consequence of strabismus and amblyopia is a loss of normal binocular functions. Under binocular viewing conditions, many individuals with these disorders are essentially monocular. Attempts to improve or restore binocular function in such individuals are hampered by chronic suppression of the weaker eye. Preliminary investigations (Nei R03-04297-01) have uncovered a way to disrupt suppression in normal and binocularly abnormal individuals. Suppression, in the form of binocular rivalry, is produced whenever different stimuli are presented to corresponding points in each eye. At any instant, a normal observer will see only one of the monocular stimuli at each location in the visual field. Observers with chronic suppression will see only the stimulus in the dominant eye. However, when briefly or intermittently presented, dichoptic stimuli appear to fuse. I have discovered that this 'abnormal fusion' is seen by many stereoblind subjects. The processes underlying this abnormal fusion are not understood and the potential uses of abnormal fusion in the treatment of impaired binocular vision have not been explored. The proposed research has four aims: A) to describe the process responsible for abnormal fusion in normal subjects, B) to describe the function of that process in normal vision, C) to examine changes in that process accompanying the binocular abnormalities that lead to stereoblindness and chronic suppression, and D) to determine if we can use knowledge about such a process to enhance the binocular capabilities of binocularly impaired individuals.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01EY005087-02
Application #
3259840
Study Section
Visual Sciences B Study Section (VISB)
Project Start
1983-12-01
Project End
1986-11-30
Budget Start
1984-12-01
Budget End
1985-11-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1985
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
Palmer, Evan M; Horowitz, Todd S; Torralba, Antonio et al. (2011) What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:58-71
Wolfe, Jeremy M; Palmer, Evan M; Horowitz, Todd S (2010) Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search. Vision Res 50:1304-11
Wolfe, Jeremy M; Reijnen, Ester; Van Wert, Michael J et al. (2009) In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance. Vision Res 49:765-73
Wolfe, Jeremy M; Horowitz, Todd S; Van Wert, Michael J et al. (2007) Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 136:623-38
Wolfe, Jeremy M; Horowitz, Todd S; Michod, Kristin O (2007) Is visual attention required for robust picture memory? Vision Res 47:955-64
Wolfe, J M; Klempen, N; Dahlen, K (2000) Postattentive vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:693-716
Wolfe, J M; Bennett, S C (1997) Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Res 37:25-43
Wolfe, J M (1995) The pertinence of research on visual search to radiologic practice. Acad Radiol 2:74-8
Bilsky, A B; Wolfe, J M (1995) Part-whole information is useful in visual search for size x size but not orientation x orientation conjunctions. Percept Psychophys 57:749-60
Wolfe, J M; Friedman-Hill, S R; Bilsky, A B (1994) Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks. Percept Psychophys 55:537-50