This is a proposal for competitive renewal of the currently funded R01 grant entitled "Systematic psychophysical investigation of visual learning". Visual perceptual learning (VPL) is regarded as a promising tool that can help clarify important aspects of visual and brain plasticity. Our long-term goal is to delineate general rules that govern VPL, and to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of visual and brain plasticity. During the currently supported period, we have attained great success in clarifying the characteristics of perceptual and behavioral changes under VPL, often by examining how performance at or around a trained feature value is changed as a result of visual training. However, new serious controversies about the mechanisms of VPL have emerged. One controversy concerns the locus of VPL, or the visual and brain information processing stage that is changed in association with VPL. The other concerns how VPL with location specificity or transfer is developed during training. We will conduct systematic psychophysical research with the aim of building two separate but related models, each of which concerns where or how VPL is developed to resolve each of these controversies, so that these two models will be integrated to a unified model of VPL.
In Aim 1, we will attempt to resolve the controversy about the locus of VPL by developing a two-stage model that can account for both the findings that support low-level changes and those that support higher-level stages, without denying either evidence for the low-level or higher-level models. By conducting a variety of experiments with different types of tasks, stimuli and procedures, we will psychophysically test the validity of this two-stage model as well as existing models.
In Aim 2, we will attempt to resolve the second controversy. The reduction of the degree of location specificity by double training has exposed serious limitations in how existing models explain location specificity. Thus far, no theoretical model has been proposed that can clearly explain how location specificity occurs by single training, as well as how location specificity is weakened/eliminated by double training. Based on our recent finding of elimination of VPL followed by reactivation and our influential reinforcement model, we will build the reinforcement reactivation model that assumes that the elimination of location specificity after double training is due to a failure to reconsolidate location specific learning tat was reactivated by reinforcement signals. In a series of experiments, we will test the validity of this reinforcement reactivation model and other existing models. In both aims, results of experiments will also be used to further refine the proposed models to most suitably account for where and how VPL is developed. Examinations of these aims will help to achieve our long-term goal of clarifying general functional rules that govern VPL.
The project systematically examines visual perceptual learning (VPL) using a unified psychophysical method to develop new models to resolve serious controversies in the research on VPL and to test the validity of these models and existing models. The current proposal investigates: how the conflict regarding which information processing stage is changed in association of VPL can be resolved and the question concerning how the specificity and transfer in VPL in different conditions occur can be answered. The resulting scientific knowledge may lead to improved diagnoses of, and rehabilitative therapies for, brain disorders and lesions, in particular those related to visual function.
|Sasaki, Yuka; Watanabe, Takeo (2016) V3A takes over a job of MT+ after training on a visual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:6092-3|
|Tamaki, Masako; Bang, Ji Won; Watanabe, Takeo et al. (2016) Night Watch in One Brain Hemisphere during Sleep Associated with the First-Night Effect in Humans. Curr Biol 26:1190-4|
|Shibata, Kazuhisa; Sasaki, Yuka; Kawato, Mitsuo et al. (2016) Neuroimaging Evidence for 2 Types of Plasticity in Association with Visual Perceptual Learning. Cereb Cortex 26:3681-9|
|Amano, Kaoru; Shibata, Kazuhisa; Kawato, Mitsuo et al. (2016) Learning to Associate Orientation with Color in Early Visual Areas by Associative Decoded fMRI Neurofeedback. Curr Biol 26:1861-6|
|Watanabe, Takeo; Sasaki, Yuka (2015) Perceptual learning: toward a comprehensive theory. Annu Rev Psychol 66:197-221|
|Berard, Aaron V; Cain, Matthew S; Watanabe, Takeo et al. (2015) Frequent video game players resist perceptual interference. PLoS One 10:e0120011|
|Kim, Yong-Hwan; Kang, Dong-Wha; Kim, Dongho et al. (2015) Real-Time Strategy Video Game Experience and Visual Perceptual Learning. J Neurosci 35:10485-92|
|Å½aric, Gojko; Yazdanbakhsh, Arash; Nishina, Shigeaki et al. (2015) Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth. J Vis 15:13|
|Kim, Dongho; Seitz, Aaron R; Watanabe, Takeo (2015) Visual perceptual learning by operant conditioning training follows rules of contingency. Vis cogn 23:147-160|
|Chang, Li-Hung; Yotsumoto, Yuko; Salat, David H et al. (2015) Reduction in the retinotopic early visual cortex with normal aging and magnitude of perceptual learning. Neurobiol Aging 36:315-22|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 40 publications