Major research activities are underway to develop and improve technologies for disease screening, for diagnosing disease, for predicting its course and for monitoring its treatment. New biomarkers, imaging modalities, clinical prediction scores, staging systems and genomic/proteomic profiles are amongst candidate prediction technologies for which we use the generic terms 'predictive markers' and 'medical tests' here. Before being implemented in practice, however, the diagnostic and prognostic capacities of tests (or markers) must be evaluated rigorously, particularly in view of potentially grave or costly consequences associated with errors. ? ? This grant will continue to develop statistical methods for the evaluation of studies that seek to investigate predictive markers. The methodology we propose to develop in Aims 1-4 will examine the extent to which a marker reflects the outcome variable of interest (e.g., disease, disease outcome or treatment failure) as is of primary interest in the early stages of marker development. It will allow identification of conditions/populations that maximize the discriminatory capacity of a marker (Aim 1) and of optimal algorithms for combining multiple predictive markers (Aim 4).
Aims 2 and 3 seek to extend statistical methods for characterizing discrimination to accommodate data on outcome variables that are time dependent and censored (Aim 2) or that are subject to verification biased sampling (Aim 3), which is common in practice. Finally, in Aim 5 we will develop statistical methods for characterizing and comparing the predictive values of markers when applied prospectively in defined populations, as is typically of interest in the later stages of marker development.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM054438-10
Application #
6943987
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-SNEM-5 (01))
Program Officer
Whitmarsh, John
Project Start
1996-05-01
Project End
2007-05-09
Budget Start
2005-09-01
Budget End
2007-05-09
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$327,029
Indirect Cost
Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
078200995
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98109
Kerr, Kathleen F; Brown, Marshall; Janes, Holly (2017) Reply to A.J. Vickers et al. J Clin Oncol 35:473-475
Kim, Soyoung; Huang, Ying (2017) Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment. Stat Med 36:2347-2362
Kerr, Kathleen F; Brown, Marshall D; Zhu, Kehao et al. (2016) Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use. J Clin Oncol 34:2534-40
Fong, Youyi; Yin, Shuxin; Huang, Ying (2016) Combining biomarkers linearly and nonlinearly for classification using the area under the ROC curve. Stat Med 35:3792-809
Pepe, Margaret S; Janes, Holly; Li, Christopher I et al. (2016) Early-Phase Studies of Biomarkers: What Target Sensitivity and Specificity Values Might Confer Clinical Utility? Clin Chem 62:737-42
Huang, Ying (2016) Evaluating and comparing biomarkers with respect to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in two-phase case-control studies. Biostatistics 17:499-522
Huang, Ying; Laber, Eric (2016) Personalized Evaluation of Biomarker Value: A Cost-Benefit Perspective. Stat Biosci 8:43-65
Pepe, Margaret Sullivan (2015) Response. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:356
Pepe, Margaret S; Fan, Jing; Feng, Ziding et al. (2015) The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets. Stat Biosci 7:282-295
Pepe, Margaret S; Li, Christopher I; Feng, Ziding (2015) Improving the quality of biomarker discovery research: the right samples and enough of them. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:944-50

Showing the most recent 10 out of 74 publications