This proposal addresses fundamental issues in the evolution of biological knowledge and reasoning, across cultures and across development. Researchers have long recognized that children are not tabulae rosae. Instead, they bring with them theories and concepts of the world. When these differ radically from those of adults, children's existing theories can be obstacles to learning. Years of research have suggested that the very concepts that adults hold as central (e.g., alive, animal), may be represented in an altogether different fashion in children. Unfortunately, this prior research has focused almost exclusively on middle-class, urban, technologically-advanced populations. This narrow empirical base makes it impossible to determine a) whether the theories held by these children are universal, b) how these early theories are shaped by culture and input conditions, c) how to best characterize the mechanisms underlying developmental change. The goal of this proposal is to redress this limitation by identifying core biological concepts and reasoning in young children from different cultural groups and to trace their developmental trajectories into adulthood. Populations include Chicago (suburban; urban), Wisconsin (rural majority culture; rural native American (Menominee); Mexico (Yukatek Maya; Ladino). dramatically expands the database on concept development and provides new understanding of normative theories by analyzing the various developmental motivations and patterns. Each population participates in 4 series of experiments, each aimed at a different aspect of knowledge within the biological domain. Experimental tasks include: (1) name generation, (2) reasoning tasks, (3) parent-child speech dyads, and (4) ethnographic description of classroom and other instructional content. These developmental, cross-cultural experiments will help us ascertain which biological concepts (if any) are universal, and determine how these are shaped by the culture in which an individual is immersed. Ensuing knowledge of particular cultural conceptions about the biological world and how it works may be critical in understanding the educational possibilities for learning about biology - the new cornerstone of any science curriculum in the twenty-first century - and for maintaining environmental health.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01HD041653-01
Application #
6417961
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BBBP-4 (01))
Program Officer
Berch, Daniel B
Project Start
2002-04-01
Project End
2007-03-31
Budget Start
2002-04-01
Budget End
2003-03-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$291,164
Indirect Cost
Name
Northwestern University at Chicago
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
City
Evanston
State
IL
Country
United States
Zip Code
60201
Medin, Douglas; Waxman, Sandra; Woodring, Jennie et al. (2010) Human-centeredness is Not a Universal Feature of Young Children's Reasoning: Culture and Experience Matter When Reasoning About Biological Entities. Cogn Dev 25:197-207
Herrmann, Patricia; Waxman, Sandra R; Medin, Douglas L (2010) Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children's reasoning about the natural world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9979-84
Leddon, Erin M; Waxman, Sandra R; Medin, Douglas L (2008) Unmasking ""Alive:"" Children's Appreciation of a Concept Linking All Living Things. J Cogn Dev 9:461-473
Anggoro, Florencia K; Waxman, Sandra R; Medin, Douglas L (2008) Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts: evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychol Sci 19:314-9
Bang, Megan; Medin, Douglas L; Atran, Scott (2007) Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:13868-74
Waxman, Sandra; Medin, Douglas; Ross, Norbert (2007) Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Dev Psychol 43:294-308