Motor skill training and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have separately been shown to alter cortical excitability and enhance motor function in humans. Their combination is appealing for augmenting motor recovery in stroke patients, and this is an area presently under heavy investigation globally. We had previously proposed that the success of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a complementary therapeutic tool in physical neurorehabilitation may be contingent upon a more precise knowledge of the circumstances under which the two techniques interact, and the subsequent behavioral outcome. To test this we applied tDCS with conventional parameters (polarity, location, intensity and duration), but manipulated the timing of application in relation to a simple robotic motor practice task, in affected muscles of hemiplegic patients. We showed a profound effect of timing. We showed that performance improvement over one session of practice was differentially affected by tDCS depending on the timing of application. 20 mins of robotic visuomotor training only, led to a preferential increase in movement speed without a loss of accuracy. tDCS applied at any of the timings obliterated this effect, yet when tDCS was applied before training, the effect was substituted for an improvement in smoothness. Movement smoothness is associated with more advanced stages of motor learning and has high correlation with functional clinical scales. We showed for the first time that the timing of tDCS application has functional significance, that tDCS applied prior to training can be beneficial for voluntary behavior, and that tDCS effects may not simply be additive to training effects, but may change the nature of the training effect. We have separately reported in a randomized-controlled clinical trial, that upperlimb robotic training alone over 12 weeks can improve clinical function of chronic stroke patients. Based on our results with tDCS and robotic training, we hypothesize that the same repeated sessions of robotic training, but preceded by tDCS, would lead to a sustained and functional change greater than robotic training alone. In the proposed training study, 66 stable chronic stroke patients will be randomized to receive sham or real tDCS prior to robotic upperlimb training, and will be assessed at 3 levels of change: (i) clinical, (ii) kinematic, and (iii) neurophysiologic. We will determine if clinical function can be improved and sustained with tDCS-robotic training, the precise kinematic aspects of movement, and cortical physiology changes that underlie functional improvements.
Stroke survivors are often left with residual motor dysfunction, which despite the best-known care results in substantial personal, social and economic cost. We suggest that Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) delivered prior to robotic motor training will improve clinical function when performed over 12 weeks of training. We propose to test cortical neurophysiology and kinematic changes in relation to improved clinical function to report the specific aspects of movement control that are enhanced, and the underlying brain plasticity. This will help understand the physiological and behavioral aspects of this emerging rehabilitation strategy, and may be useful to guide clinical trials for optimizing motor recovery in stroke, and ultimately to have broader application to other neurological disorders.
|Murray, Lynda M; Edwards, Dylan J; Ruffini, Giulio et al. (2015) Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:S114-21|
|Michmizos, Konstantinos P; Krebs, Hermano Igo (2014) Reaction time in ankle movements: a diffusion model analysis. Exp Brain Res 232:3475-88|
|Michmizos, Konstantinos P; Krebs, Hermano Igo (2014) Pointing with the ankle: the speed-accuracy trade-off. Exp Brain Res 232:647-57|
|Oberman, Lindsay M; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro (2014) Hyperplasticity in Autism Spectrum Disorder confers protection from Alzheimer's disease. Med Hypotheses 83:337-42|
|Halko, Mark A; Farzan, Faranak; Eldaief, Mark C et al. (2014) Intermittent theta-burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum increases functional connectivity of the default network. J Neurosci 34:12049-56|
|Fox, Michael D; Buckner, Randy L; Liu, Hesheng et al. (2014) Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E4367-75|
|Lee, Hyunglae; Krebs, Hermano Igo; Hogan, Neville (2014) Multivariable dynamic ankle mechanical impedance with active muscles. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 22:971-81|
|Krebs, Hermano I; Krams, Michael; Agrafiotis, Dimitris K et al. (2014) Robotic measurement of arm movements after stroke establishes biomarkers of motor recovery. Stroke 45:200-4|
|Edwards, Dylan J; Dipietro, Laura; Demirtas-Tatlidede, Asli et al. (2014) Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11:31|
|Giacobbe, V; Krebs, H I; Volpe, B T et al. (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing. NeuroRehabilitation 33:49-56|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 14 publications