Regulation of work hours for physicians in training was put in place by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2003, long after similar regulations were implemented in trucking, aviation, and in other occupations where acute and chronic sleep deprivation raise significant concerns about safety. The impact of duty hour regulation has been controversial. While there is some evidence that this improved mortality outcomes in the short-term, little is known about the impact on educational outcomes, longer-term clinical outcomes, or the mechanisms creating inter-hospital differences in the effectiveness of duty hour reform in improving either clinical or educational outcomes. With assistance from the American Board of Surgery, the American Board of Internal Medicine, the National Board of Medical Examiners, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine and Surgery, and the American College of Physicians, we propose to complete the following specific aims: 1. To describe the variety and frequency of program-level behavioral responses to duty hour reform and resident work conditions by conducting national surveys of program directors and residents in Internal Medicine (IM) and General Surgery (GS) informed by qualitative field work at a sample of IM and GS residency programs. 2. To assess how educational outcomes (board scores) have changed over time in conjunction with duty hour reform for residents in different specialties. 3. To examine how clinical outcomes (mortality, failure-to-rescue, probability of a prolonged length of stay, patient safety indicators) have changed over time beyond the first two years post-duty hour reform. 4. To examine the relationship between changes in educational and clinical outcomes and hospital financial performance, physician extender and nurse staffing levels, and program responses identified in the national survey of program directors. The proposed analysis will be the first to pull together national data on educational and clinical outcomes and will help us understand why duty hour regulation reform for physicians in training worked - or did not work - in terms of improving educational and clinical outcomes. This is an important policy question given that the physicians who are the subject of these reforms provide care to tens of millions of Americans each year.

Public Health Relevance

Regulation of duty hours for physicians in training in 2003 represented one of the most significant efforts ever undertaken to improve patient safety in American hospitals. It is largely unknown how these regulations affected patient outcomes, the quality of physician training, and how programs responded to improve or maintain patient outcomes and the quality of residency training. In this study, we will examine how residency programs and hospitals responded to the duty hour reform and how these behavioral responses determined which residency programs and hospitals experienced relative improvements or worsening in educational and clinical outcomes, important questions given that tens of millions of Americans receive care from the physicians in training who were the subject of the duty hour regulation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HL094593-02
Application #
7882524
Study Section
Health Services Organization and Delivery Study Section (HSOD)
Program Officer
Wells, Barbara L
Project Start
2009-07-01
Project End
2012-04-30
Budget Start
2010-05-01
Budget End
2011-04-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$773,473
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Patel, Mitesh S; Volpp, Kevin G; Small, Dylan S et al. (2014) Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions among hospitalized Medicare patients. JAMA 312:2364-73
Volpp, Kevin G; Small, Dylan S; Romano, Patrick S et al. (2013) Teaching hospital five-year mortality trends in the wake of duty hour reforms. J Gen Intern Med 28:1048-55
Szymczak, Julia E; Bosk, Charles L (2012) Training for efficiency: work, time, and systems-based practice in medical residency. J Health Soc Behav 53:344-58
Borman, Karen R; Jones, Andrew T; Shea, Judy A (2012) Duty hours, quality of care, and patient safety: general surgery resident perceptions. J Am Coll Surg 215:70-7; discussion 77-9
Shea, Judy A; Willett, Lisa L; Borman, Karen R et al. (2012) Anticipated consequences of the 2011 duty hours standards: views of internal medicine and surgery program directors. Acad Med 87:895-903
Veazey Brooks, Joanna; Bosk, Charles L (2012) Remaking surgical socialization: work hour restrictions, rites of passage, and occupational identity. Soc Sci Med 75:1625-32
Shea, Judy A; Weissman, Arlene; McKinney, Sean et al. (2012) Internal medicine trainees' views of training adequacy and duty hours restrictions in 2009. Acad Med 87:889-94
Borman, Karen R; Biester, Thomas W; Jones, Andrew T et al. (2011) Sleep, supervision, education, and service: views of junior and senior residents. J Surg Educ 68:495-501
Silber, Jeffrey H; Rosenbaum, Paul R; Brachet, Tanguy J et al. (2010) The Hospital Compare mortality model and the volume-outcome relationship. Health Serv Res 45:1148-67
Szymczak, Julia E; Brooks, Joanna Veazey; Volpp, Kevin G et al. (2010) To leave or to lie? Are concerns about a shift-work mentality and eroding professionalism as a result of duty-hour rules justified? Milbank Q 88:350-81