Developers of ambulatory care information systems are challenged by the difficulty of meeting the simultaneous and often conflicting, goals of 1) capturing and electronically representing clinical data with sufficient expressibility to provide adequate and accurate documentation of the patient encounter, and 2) utilizing standardized terminologies, such as diagnostic and procedure codes, which are inadequate to express the details of the patient encounter, but which facilitate communication with other types of computer based systems.
The aim of this study is to compare selected standardized coding and classification systems for their ability to represent the terms used by physicians (MDs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) to document in the ambulatory care record. Each system will be tested with a sample of 1000 (500 MD and 500 NP) patient encounters for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care. The unit of analysis for this study is the clinical term. Two types of terms will be evaluated using a semi-automated lexical matching approach: 1) the natural language terms charted by the MDs and NPs, and 2) the base concepts of the natural language terms which will be derived by stripping the modifiers from the terms and will include synonyms and lexical variants of the terms. The quality of the representation will be measured by a concept match score based on hierarchical classification relationships The stuart extension of the McNemar test for correlated proportions will be used to compare the systems on concept match scores. The adequacy of the representation for clinical use will be judged by a survey of MDs (n=30) and NPs (n=30) experienced in clinical care of patients with HIV disease. The findings of the proposed study have the potential to identify areas for extension and refinement of the existing standardized coding and classification systems. Secondarily, a product of the study will be the development of a lexicon of clinical terms used by MD and NP providers in HIV ambulatory care, along with the best """"""""matching"""""""" standardized terms from among the existing standardized coding and classification systems in a format that is exportable for use in other sites.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01NR004423-01A1
Application #
2469107
Study Section
Nursing Research Study Section (NURS)
Program Officer
Sigmon, Hilary D
Project Start
1998-03-01
Project End
2000-02-29
Budget Start
1998-03-01
Budget End
1999-02-28
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California San Francisco
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Nursing
DUNS #
073133571
City
San Francisco
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94143
Coenen, A; Marin, H F; Park, H A et al. (2001) Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts in computer-based systems: international perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8:202-11
Bakken, S; Warren, J; Lundberg, C et al. (2001) An evaluation of the utility of the CEN categorical structure for nursing diagnoses as a terminology model for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED. Medinfo 10:151-5
Bakken, S; Campbell, K E; Cimino, J J et al. (2000) Toward vocabulary domain specifications for health level 7-coded data elements. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:333-42
Bakken, S; Cimino, J J; Haskell, R et al. (2000) Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:529-38
Bakken, S; Cashen, M S; Mendonca, E A et al. (2000) Representing nursing activities within a concept-oriented terminological system: evaluation of a type definition. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7:81-90
Bakken, S; Parker, J; Konicek, D et al. (2000) An evaluation of ICNP intervention axes as terminology model components. Proc AMIA Symp :42-6
Bakken, S; Cashen, M S; O'Brien, A (1999) Evaluation of a type definition for representing nursing activities within a concept-based terminologic system. Proc AMIA Symp :17-21
Henry, S B; Warren, J J; Lange, L et al. (1998) A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5:321-8