It has become apparent during the previous twenty years that many neurological disease traits do not result from coding region mutations within genes, but instead manifest because of alterations of the genome. Genomic disorders are a class of conditions that result from genomic rearrangements rather than base pair changes of DNA sequence. In general, two major types of rearrangements are observed: recurrent and nonrecurrent genomic changes. Recurrent rearrangements have a common size in different patients;in which the breakpoints occur at 'fixed'genomic positions, or breakpoint cluster regions. The breakpoints cluster in paralogous segments of the human genome (also referred to as low-copy repeats, LCRs, or segmental duplications, SDs) that facilitate a non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) by both stimulating and mediating the rearrangement. Nonrecurrent rearrangements can be of different sizes in different patients, but usually share a """"""""smallest region of overlap"""""""" (SRO) in which the critical genomic contents and/or gene(s) reside. Genomic disorders produced by non-recurrent rearrangements provide a unique challenge for studies of genotype/phenotype correlations. The variable size and genomic content as well as the frequent co- occurrence of complex alterations (e.g. triplications and inversions) that can occur with nonrecurrent rearrangements add further complexity to interpreting the genome and gene variation in the context of each patient's clinical manifestations. We hypothesize that nonrecurrent rearrangements may occur by mechanisms that are distinct from homologous recombination mechanisms;our preliminary studies and recent publications from the first year of this stimulus grant strongly support this hypothesis. Furthermore, we suggested some nonrecurrent rearrangements may result because of specific genome architectural features causing susceptibility to such rearrangements. We plan to investigate these hypotheses in an attempt to learn """"""""the rules"""""""" for mechanisms leading to nonrecurrent rearrangements. We will investigate these hypotheses experimentally by;1) mapping breakpoints of duplication rearrangements, triplication rearrangements, and complex rearrangements. 2) performing bioinformatic analyses of the genomic region undergoing rearrangement, and 3) determining the products of recombination through direct DNA sequences of the recombinant junction;i.e. breakpoint sequencing. 4) studying marker genotypes by whole-genome arrays in trios that consist of patients with disease associated de novo complex rearrangements and their unaffected parents to surmise strand exchanges or potential template switches by the segregation of marker haplotypes. Finally, we will attempt to elucidate genes that may be important to these rearrangement processes by whole genome sequencing of personal genomes in subjects, or parents of these subjects, with multiple de novo CNV events. In this manner we will identify the substrates for recombination, gain insights into genome architecture in regions involved, and potentially infer mechanisms for the rearrangements.
to public health is that the project will provide new insights into mechanisms for genomic changes that result from nonrecurrent rearrangements enabling better diagnostics and potential new avenues for therapy by correcting gene dosage. Such genome rearrangements cause gene copy number variations (CNV) that result in neurodevelopmental disorders such as mental retardation, behavioral disorders such as autism, psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, and neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer dementia, Parkinson disease and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorders.
|Iacovazzo, Donato; Caswell, Richard; Bunce, Benjamin et al. (2016) Germline or somatic GPR101 duplication leads to X-linked acrogigantism: a clinico-pathological and genetic study. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:56|
|Ockeloen, Charlotte W; Khandelwal, Kriti D; Dreesen, Karoline et al. (2016) Novel mutations in LRP6 highlight the role of WNT signaling in tooth agenesis. Genet Med 18:1158-1162|
|Carvalho, Claudia M B; Lupski, James R (2016) Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat Rev Genet 17:224-38|
|Harel, Tamar; Yoon, Wan Hee; Garone, Caterina et al. (2016) Recurrent De Novo and Biallelic Variation of ATAD3A, Encoding a Mitochondrial Membrane Protein, Results in Distinct Neurological Syndromes. Am J Hum Genet 99:831-845|
|Yuan, Bo; Liu, Pengfei; Rogers, Jeffrey et al. (2016) Copy number analysis of the low-copy repeats at the primate NPHP1 locus by array comparative genomic hybridization. Genom Data 8:106-9|
|Loviglio, Maria Nicla; Beck, Christine R; White, Janson J et al. (2016) Identification of a RAI1-associated disease network through integration of exome sequencing, transcriptomics, and 3D genomics. Genome Med 8:105|
|Bekheirnia, Mir Reza; Bekheirnia, Nasim; Bainbridge, Matthew N et al. (2016) Whole-exome sequencing in the molecular diagnosis of individuals with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and identification of a new causative gene. Genet Med :|
|Nageshappa, S; Carromeu, C; Trujillo, C A et al. (2016) Altered neuronal network and rescue in a human MECP2 duplication model. Mol Psychiatry 21:178-88|
|Naves, Luciana A; Daly, Adrian F; Dias, Luiz Augusto et al. (2016) Aggressive tumor growth and clinical evolution in a patient with X-linked acro-gigantism syndrome. Endocrine 51:236-44|
|Charng, Wu-Lin; Karaca, Ender; Coban Akdemir, Zeynep et al. (2016) Exome sequencing in mostly consanguineous Arab families with neurologic disease provides a high potential molecular diagnosis rate. BMC Med Genomics 9:42|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 110 publications