Debates about the meaning and requirements for child assent to research participation permeate the bioethics, medical, and psychology literatures, but empirical research in this area is in its infancy. The assent process is important for conforming to research regulations but can also be used to enhance children's sense of self- efficacy in health care settings. Optimizing children's roles in research decision making is critical, especially during pre-adolescence and adolescence, when children begin to strive for and acquire more decision making independence. Prior research on child assent has been based on a model that focuses on cognitive capabilities;this research examines children's understanding of the elements of research and the factors that influence their understanding. A second model of child assent focuses on the relational context of children's decision making. This model recognizes that decision making typically occurs in a family context and attends to the role of collaborative decision making in normative development. The relational model focuses not on who makes the decision, but on how parents and children talk about it. It reflects the view that children can be involved in decisions in various ways and that parents play an important role as sources of support and advice across the child's development. The primary objective of this research is to examine the benefits of children's involvement in decisions about clinical trial enrollment and whether these benefits vary based on child demographic and psychosocial characteristics. In other words, do some children benefit more from involvement than others? For the purpose of this research, the potential benefits of assent include children's perceptions of the fairness of the decision making process and their sense of self-efficacy. The assumption of the proposed research is that how adults and children interact about the research decision is more relevant for children's self-efficacy than who ultimately makes the decision. This innovative study will assess families within 10 days of having made an actual decision about clinical trial enrollment for the treatment of a chronic condition in the child. The research team will test the relationship between child involvement in the research decision and perception of fairness and self-efficacy (Aim 1), determine if the relationship between child involvement and the benefits of child assent depends on child demographic and psychosocial characteristics, such as age and perceived stress (Aim 2), and test the relationship between child involvement in the research decision and characteristics of the research, including perceived risks and benefits and research personnel behaviors (Aim 3). This research will provide data about children's actual involvement in research decisions and the factors that make their involvement more or less beneficial. Data from this project has implications for ethical questions related to child assent and will lead to the development of interventions and guidelines to enhance child involvement in research decision making.
The question of when and how to involve children in decisions about research participation has been a source of debate. This project will examine whether different levels of involvement in the assent process influence children's perceptions of the fairness of the decision making process and their sense of self-efficacy. Such data is critical for understanding how researchers and clinicians can optimize assent for individual children- not only so that research regulations are met, but also to help children flourish as a result of the assent process.
|Miller, Victoria A (2018) Involving Youth With a Chronic Illness in Decision-making: Highlighting the Role of Providers. Pediatrics 142:S142-S148|
|Miller, Victoria A (2018) Optimizing Children's Involvement in Decision Making Requires Moving Beyond the Concept of Ability. Am J Bioeth 18:20-22|
|Miller, Victoria A; Feudtner, Chris; Jawad, Abbas F (2017) Children's Decision-Making Involvement About Research Participation: Associations With Perceived Fairness and Self-Efficacy. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 12:87-96|
|Kim, Scott Y H; Miller, Franklin G (2016) Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons. IRB 38:1-5|
|Miller, Victoria A; Feudtner, Chris (2016) Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation. IRB 38:1-7|